Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.H-9 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> identified as"Change Existing+Project+Cum from Existing";"Change 2035 Cum <br /> NP from Existing NP";and "Change 2035+Project from Existing NP"). The table <br /> shows that the noise levels would increase in 2036 by a significant amount <br /> (compared to the existing levels)before addition of the noise from the increased <br /> project truck traffic.The additional truck traffic noise that would be associated <br /> with the proposed project would further increase traffic noise and contribute to a <br /> significant cumulative noise impact. <br /> ' Sound barriers are not feasible in the semi-rural areas that would be affected by <br /> cumulative traffic increases,because the barriers would be far removed from the <br /> activity areas of sensitive receptors and the sound barriers would generally be an <br /> unnatural barrier not only to noise but also to distant views now possible in <br /> these areas. Thus,no mitigations are available for this cumulative impact other <br /> than reducing project operations. <br /> ' The project would contribute to a cumulatively significant and unmitigable <br /> increase in air pollutant emissions. The proposed project would have a less than <br /> ' significant(project-level)impact on ozone impacts (after implementation of <br /> Mitigation Measures IV.D-2a and D-2b). However, cumulative projects within <br /> the project vicinity would potentially result in a significant impact for ozone. <br /> The residual emissions from the project(emissions after mitigation and <br /> emissions from the extended years of landfill operations, and increased daily <br /> acceptance rate [above existing actual emissions], as a result of the project)would <br /> contribute to the overall ozone impact in the region. <br /> With Mitigation Measure IV.D-2a and D-2b, the impacts of PM,o from the project <br /> individually would be less than significant. However,the project would add to <br /> the cumulatively significant impact for particulate matter within the project <br /> vicinity. Because the project would result in PM,o emissions from traffic and <br /> operations every day (due to the extended years of landfill operations as a result <br /> of the project),the project contribution would be cumulatively considerable. <br /> No cumulatively potentially significant impacts were identified for the following topics: <br /> Public Health and Safety, Hydrology and Water Quality,Soils and Geology,Vegetation <br /> and Wildlife,Public Services and Utilities, Cultural Resources, and Visual Quality. <br /> H. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts <br /> After mitigation,project implementation would have the following unavoidable <br /> significant adverse impacts: <br /> • Project traffic would contribute to unacceptable Levels of Service at the following <br /> intersections under 2035 cumulative conditions: <br /> o SR 99 SB On-off Ramps &E. French Camp Rd., (AM and PM peak hours) <br /> o SR 99 Urban Interchange&Arch Rd. (AM and PM peak hours) <br /> o SR 99 SB On-off Ramps &Mariposa Rd. (AM and PM peak hours) <br /> o SR 99 NB On-off Ramps &Mariposa Rd. (PM peak hour) <br /> 1 <br />