SU0011836 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' John Funderburg, Principal Planner October 30, 2018 Paige 18 • "The County shall strive to ensure that hazardous materials and wastes do not contaminate air;water,or soil resources."Getteral Plan Public lieulth and Safety Flentent, referenced in SDEIR at IV.A-6. 15 The Project is clearly inconsistent with bath policies. It would pose-a threat to adjacent (cont.) fanning opei-ations becauac it would likely worsen already contaminated groundwater. In addition, the new landfill cells would increase the risk of crop contamination due to the landfill's inability to control litter. The EIR should be revised to include an analysis of these General Pian inconsistencies. H. The SDEIR Must Re Itevised and Recirculated, Under California law,this SDEIR cannot properly forin the basis of final EIR, support the findings required by CEQA,car justify the County's approval of tate Proicct. To eon•eet the numerous en-or; and ornissions identified above,the document recltures a complete revision. CEQA and Ilic C'F:QA Ctiridelines require recirculation of a draft EIR 16 when: (1) the addition of significant new infnu7natitm to the FIR after liuhlie notice is given of the availability of the DF.1R but before certification,or(2) the draft EiR is so "fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that nieaningl'ul public review and comment were precluded."CEQA Guidelincas § 15088.5. Hein.,because the original SDEllk was wholly inadequate, any revisions to the SDEIR must be recirculated fbr public review and comment. U, Conclusion For the reasons set tort! above, we respeciftilly request that no furflier consideration be given 10 the proposed Project until in El is prepared and circulated that ' fully complies with CBQA, Very truly yours, SHUTE, lvlMALY & WEINBERGER LLP lr1 ,,gyre, Laurel L. lmpett, AiCP, Urban Planner Rachel B. Hcwfw.t SM-11l= MIFIALY V1E1NBLltGl1Rw-