My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011836
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800090
>
SU0011836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011836
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800090
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106003, -05, 18115007, -16
ENTERED_DATE
6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/15/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EHD COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\DRAFT SEIR-09-2018.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EIR-07-2018.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page VIII-95 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> L-13. The comment states that the proposed project would be inconsistent with the <br /> County's General Plan Policies regarding odor,litter impacts on adjacent agricultural <br /> operations, and a significant history of traffic collisions. The Commenter does not cite to <br /> any specific evidence of the claimed history of such impacts.The heading in the <br /> Commenter's letter also refers to an alleged incompatibility with the County Airport <br /> Land Use Plan. <br /> The DSEIR includes an analysis of potential bird strike hazards on pages IV.A-24 <br /> through IV.A-28. Implementation of the procedures to discourage and monitor bird <br /> populations and comply with regulatory requirements related to bird hazards that <br /> ' are proposed as part of the project,along with Mitigation Measure A.4, would reduce <br /> bird hazard impacts to a less-than-significant level. As discussed in Response F-2, the <br /> staff of the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG)has stated that Mitigation <br /> ' Measure A-4 addresses concern regarding wildlife hazards. Further, SJCOG which <br /> administers the County Airport Land Use Plan has found that the Project would be <br /> consistent with the ALUP(see SJCOG Response Letter dated 11/2/18).For these <br /> reasons,the proposed project would be consistent with airport operations, and would be <br /> consistent with Policy TM-8.5. <br /> Odor impacts of the proposed project are discussed on pages IV.D-23 through IV.D-26. <br /> With implementation of Mitigation Measure D.3,odor impacts would be reduced to a <br /> less-than-significant level. <br /> As discussed in Response J-8, litter impacts,with implementation of procedures <br /> proposed as part of the project and mitigation measures identified in the DSEIR, as <br /> modified in Response J-8,would be less than significant. <br /> As discussed in Impact B.3, page IV.B-16 of the DSEIR, project impacts on potential <br /> traffic collisions would be less than significant. <br /> L-14. As discussed on pages IV.A-24 through IV.A-28 of the DSEIR,implementation of <br /> measures that are proposed as part of the project, along with Mitigation Measure A.4, <br /> would reduce bird hazard impacts to a less-than-significant level. The proposed project <br /> would not endanger future operations at Stockton Metropolitan Airport. <br /> As discussed in Response J-8, litter impacts,with implementation of procedures <br /> proposed as part of the project and mitigation measures identified in the DSEIR, as <br /> modified in Response J-8, would be less than significant. <br /> Impacts to groundwater quality are considered in Impacts G.3 and G.4, on pages IV.G- <br /> p g <br /> 19 and IV.G-20, and Impact G.6, on page IV.G-21 and IV.G-22.With implementation of <br /> ' procedures proposed as part of the project identified in the DSEIR,the proposed 2018 <br /> Expansion Project would have a less than-than-significant impact on water quality. <br /> The desirability of disposing waste originating out-of-county at the Forward Landfill is <br /> not an environmental impact of the proposed project, and is therefore not required by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.