My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011836
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800090
>
SU0011836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011836
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800090
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106003, -05, 18115007, -16
ENTERED_DATE
6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/15/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EHD COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\DRAFT SEIR-09-2018.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EIR-07-2018.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-27 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Revised Project <br /> (25,000 metric tons/year of CO2e)16 to the State; and the project size will be compared to <br /> the estimated State GHG reduction goal of approximately 169 million metric tons of <br /> CO2e per year by 2020. As noted, the 25,000 metric ton annual limit identifies the large <br /> stationary point sources in California that make up 94 percent of the stationary <br /> emissions. If the project's total emissions are below this limit, the total emissions are <br /> equivalent in size to the smaller projects in California that as a group only make up six <br /> percent of all stationary emissions. It is assumed that the activities of these smaller <br /> projects will not conflict with State's ability to reach overall goals outlined within AB 32. <br /> In reaching its goals the CARB will focus upon the largest emitters of GHG emissions. <br /> C)Any potential conflicts with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the <br /> purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br /> The Forward Landfill would be required to comply with all applicable State plans,policies and <br /> regulations, such as AB 32 regulations and CARB's Scoping Plan (Item A). The Scoping Plan <br /> and updates will generally be implemented through mandatory regulation enacted by the <br /> GARB, and regulations that address methane emissions from landfills are one of the target GHG <br /> emissions that will be regulated. The proposed project would be required to comply with <br /> applicable provisions of the recently adopted regulation to reduce methane emissions from <br /> municipal solid waste landfills (CCR, Title 17, Subchapter 10,Article 4, Subarticle 6, Sections <br /> 95460 to 95476,Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills [Landfill Methane <br /> Rule]). The Landfill Methane Rule contains performance standards for the gas collection and <br /> control system, and specifies monitoring requirements to ensure that the system is being <br /> maintained and operated in a manner to minimize methane emissions. The Landfill Methane <br /> Rule includes a leak standard for gas collection and control system components, a monitoring <br /> requirement for wellheads,methane destruction efficiency requirements for most control <br /> devices, surface methane emission standards, and reporting requirements. <br /> Table IV.D-6 shows the net total GHG emissions from the landfill future potential scenarios <br /> compared to the current actual and current permitted conditions (Item B). The GHG emissions <br /> are based on Solid Waste Industry for Climate Solutions (SWIGS)site-specific values for <br /> collection efficiency, methane oxidation in landfill cover", and methane destruction efficiency in <br /> the flare and engines.1, <br /> The project's GHG impacts include five components: methane emissions,biogenic CO2 <br /> emissions, emission reductions from energy displacement, off-site haul truck mobile emissions <br /> and sequestered carbon. The methane emissions are anthropogenic and are considered a GHG <br /> emission from the landfill.19 The biogenic CO2 emissions are not attributed to the landfill since <br /> CO2 emissions from refuse would normally occur in the natural carbon cycle. The emission <br /> 16 The State of California has not provided guidance as to quantitative significance thresholds for assessing the impact <br /> of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and global warming concerns. Nothing in the CEQA Guidelines <br /> directly addresses this issue. <br /> 17 These rates account for the landfill cover type,results of surface emissions monitoring,and the liner type at the <br /> landfill. <br /> 11 SCS Engineers,Current MSW Industry Position and State-of-the-Practice on LFG Collection Efficiency,Methane <br /> Oxidation,and Carbon Sequestration in Landfills,Version 2.2,January 2009. <br /> 19 Methane emissions are considered to be anthropogenic because they are caused by the artificially anaerobic <br /> conditions in the landfill. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.