SU0004825 SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

April 18, 2005 NOA Project Number: E05008B 7.0 -CONCLUSIONS T In summary, satisfactory percolation rates of the soil were achieved in the proposed septic disposal Fjareas of five of the'seven parcels. The proposed Parcels 1 and 2 appear suitable for a standard septic system. The proposed Parcels 3 and 4 appear suitable for an engineered septic system. We recommend a Civil Engineer prepare a septic system design for Parcels 3 and 4 unless additional percolation testing on the Parcel indicates a satisfactory rate is achieved and approved by the EHD. Our office has be contracted by the client-to prepare engineered se tics stem designs for Parcels 3 ander 4. They will follow this reportshortly.. . . No ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled on the property. No well was available to test for`nitrate and DBCP. F1 8.0 _ LIMITATIONS The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and proposed development,the use of the subject property;and the site conditions as they existed at the time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test holes and percolation test results are'representative-of the subsurface conditions in the general area. + Our.professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of 01 all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. NEIL O.ANDERSON&ASSOC., .INC. J. F1 7. 1 _; �,` No. 211�� cts GFRT!RED F1Rebe a Haskett, B.S.. Da elch, M.Sc. ENI NEE�'�NG Project Manager CEG-2151, CHG-653, GP=1049 `Y GE()LtJ"` T _ Environmental Division Manager �� - _ 10