Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 4 <br /> PC: 11-1-90 <br /> MS-91-7 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Minor <br /> Subdivision Application No. MS-91-7 because Findings No. 1 and 2 <br /> cannot be made. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and <br /> Specific Plans. <br /> This Finding cannot be made because the proposal is <br /> inconsistent with the provisions of the AG-40 zone, which <br /> is the implementing zone for the General Plan designation <br /> of Agriculture. Specifically, the application does not <br /> meet the intent of the provision for creating a homesite <br /> parcel for the owner-operator since an owner-operator <br /> homesite parcel was granted to the applicant in 1984 . <br /> 2 . The design or improvement of the proposed division is <br /> consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. <br /> ° This Finding cannot be made because the design of the <br /> tentative map is not consistent with subdivision <br /> requirements of the Planning Title since Parcel 1 could <br /> be located on Banta Road. <br /> 3 . The site is physically suitable for the type of development. <br /> This Finding can be made because all development <br /> requirements in the County Planning Title and all minimum <br /> County standards are met. <br /> 4 . The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of <br /> development. <br /> This Finding can be made because each lot is adequately <br /> sized to meet zoning requirements. <br /> 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are <br /> not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or <br /> substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their <br /> habitat. <br /> This Finding can be made because the Initial Study <br /> prepared for this project did not identify any rare or <br /> endangered species or habitats or other substantial, <br />