SU0003944 SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

V= 69 ontiue he is_aTvery sma v �e of reiaxning building materials such as concxete bags; = wire, gravel andcolor,mixture near the wastewater treatment_plant :Thzs material poses no ' - _ environmental concerns _. _ 2: A mound"of asphalt pavement chunks are adjacent to the northeast of the.single family residence _ at 7770 West�Bates:Road=.This materia ohginated.from Mr.'Dave Olmst .Ad's.driveway, on the t - - north side ofBates Road =The.\removal contractor stockpiled-the asphalt so that it can-be._transported - . -. in the near--future. This material poses no environmental hazard ox surface contamination since tfie` F composition`hydrocarbons are completely dry _ 1 3. There is a small mound of soil..irt the extreme southwest corner{SWC} of PA 04=228, along with s " _•.k .concrete;metal piping and plastic material. None of this material appeared to be hazardous, or _- _ ::created surface contamination to the subject property. - ,4: The xelatively old transformers on PA=04.229 still show°no signs of oil leakage. .: a 5. As stated in the original.SSCR;an above ground fuel storage tank and four,empty 55 gallon- :_. _ zms of previously unknown contents were again observed on property at 28355 South Chrisman ydn -- -_ _R pr property is not part of-the project;but itis directly next to the subject property. Other. A- t- pitems of an enviroiiniental de minimus-concern-were also noted'Such as-tires :appliances, wood; and " - ``metal. De minimus conditions generally do not'present-a materal_risk to -public-health or to the -.._ environment and.generally would not hiclude an enforcement action if observed by the appropriate - - _ - �lgovernmental agencies. Condition's determined to be de-minim-us-are not recognized environmental `'conditions. Household hazardous materials maybe considered de minimus concerns if there has,..-'- e as <. w .`been no spillage or dumping,which was not observed:=This also applies to the on-site septic systems k = that serve the existing residential structures on.ttie subject parcels. _ _ _ - - L _.. . ?x i 32': _•- _`..."` .: poen CONCLUSIONS T"Under Section(c) of the San Joaquin Co rity"Development Title 9-905:12 _"Corrective Action: If -� „the report indicates there are surface and subsurface::contatriination, corrective action shall be is :; recommended in the report-and concurred-with by,Enuironmental Health prior:to the_issuance of y Y ' 0 the building permit. Since no visual environmental-concerns-that may cause surface contamination d anno evidence of sub-surface contamination was noted-on-or:near;the subject :-',,Property;this Update.and Amendment-contains na recommendations for corrective action.;:Thus - r .. ; states the-opinion of Chesney Consulting The date of the last inspection of the subject properties - was November.9, 2004. I The following general-recorn' at;ons are put forth: T -_ --�� - - - - � two cts These builds were na - s fi1. There are five buildings to be removed between the probe _ngs t = _ surve ed for Asbestos Containin Materials ACMs since it is--outside-the-s-cope-of this SSCR t : Y g ( -� - _ += .Update investigation -Tt will be the responsibility of the demolition contractor;or his $ 3 representative;to test for ACMs at the time of razing. - - — T _ -Pagc 2 of 3 P.�. Bax3794.� .7urlae CA 95381 + Of�4ce;(209)668 1403 �_Fa,�(209)668 2598 =-= - - s - . -_ t