My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012813
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BIRD
>
37400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
EIR-96-02
>
SU0012813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2020 10:34:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:29:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012813
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
EIR-96-02
STREET_NUMBER
37400
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
BIRD
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
2651206
ENTERED_DATE
1/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
37400 S BIRD RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BIRD\37400\EIR-96-02\EIR.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T <br /> 22 <br /> " affiliated groups, vernacular architecture (such as tankhouses) , <br /> and' other types of historic remains. <br /> i <br /> Research Methods <br /> Three principal methods of research and investigation were <br /> ii undertaken in response to the research design. The first of <br /> these was to examine the literature comprising the principal <br /> archaeological, ethnographic and historical data bases for the <br /> region and proposed project locality, and to obtain information <br /> by interviewing knowledgeable persons including Native Americans, <br /> The second method of investigation was to search the records of <br /> the California Historical Resources Information System for the <br /> county in which the proposed project is located. The third <br /> method of investigation was to conduct direct field inspection of <br /> the proposed project APE. The procedures invoked to obtain <br /> information using these methods are discussed in various sections <br /> of this report. Field methods and operations are discussed in <br /> the following section. <br /> Field Methods <br /> Direct field survey is undertaken by application of the <br /> programed transect survey method (Dancey 1981:45 ff. ) , generally <br /> employed to conduct cultural resources surveys in California <br /> (Moratto 1984) and elsewhere. (King 1978, Thomas 1989) . Transect <br /> surveys are carried out by formally trained, experienced <br /> archaeologists and cultural resource technicians who inspect the <br /> proposed project area by means of patterned transects. These are <br /> conducted by the field personnel walking in line abreast, <br /> covering sample segments, or, as required, the entire project <br /> area, in a systematic, orderly, and efficient manner (Thomas <br /> 1989: 228 f€. ) . Generally, transects are conducted by cultural <br /> ° resources investigation technicians maintaining intervals of not <br /> less than 5 to 15 meters (intensive survey) , or 30 meters <br /> (general survey) , the intervals usually not exceeding the latter <br /> figure. <br /> The principal objective of the transect inspection or survey' <br /> [ : method is to ensure comprehensive cultural resources inspection <br /> of the project area within limitations imposed by the following: <br /> (1) cultural resources are often buried or concealed by <br /> vegetation, and (2) adverse local conditions may impose <br /> limitations on the intensity and comprehensiveness of surface <br /> coverage. Adverse conditions include but are not limited to <br /> steep, rugged, hazardous terrain, dense thickets of chaparral and <br /> poison oak, fields planted in row crops or under flood <br /> irrigation, pastures covered with dense grass and (orbs, <br /> properties guarded by zealous dogs, and areas that are <br /> 1 <br /> -t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.