Laserfiche WebLink
F � <br /> f <br /> .i <br />{ impacts that needed mitigation•these amendments do not create an additional <br /> impacts,thus the use of"NO" for various items on the checklist. . <br /> f 9. Transportation/Circulation.- <br /> a. <br /> rans ortation/Circulation:a. Will the project generate <br /> F significant traffic volumes and/or <br /> make a significant contribution to <br /> an existing circulation problem <br /> (consider existing LOS on nearby <br /> arterials and highways,road design, <br /> access,parking,accident potential)? NO <br /> b. Will the project cause special <br /> transportation considerations <br /> (consider waterborne,rail,air, <br /> pedestrian,and bicycle traffic, <br /> and public transportation <br /> systems and parking facilities)? NO <br /> C. Will the project result in a <br /> significant increase in commuting <br /> to and from the local commurfity? NO <br /> d. Will the project be impacted <br /> f by or interfere with an airport <br /> flight path? NO <br /> e. Will the project restrict access <br /> to the surrounding area? NO <br /> The retention basin with the accompan3jngrelocation of the residential_area and <br /> removal of the second high school could result in some minor and localized changes <br /> in traffic patterns in the vicinity of the site. There will be some increases in traffic <br /> crossingByron Road as high school students living north of Byron Road travel to <br /> the high school site south of Byron Road. However,these increases are not expgcted <br /> to be significant and will be addressed in detail once the area's Specific PIan is <br /> i prepared.The relocation of the ermanent fire station location will not <br /> significantly affect traffic safe <br /> COther sources used(note all traffic studies): See appropriate sections from earlier <br /> EIRs and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. <br /> 5 , <br /> PAGE 12 <br /> r <br />