My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br /> Individually, some of these impacts are extremely significantly, some less so. plant' <br /> Cumuiativly, however, they are disastrous for the area involved, its facilities, wildlife, <br /> life and human inhabitants. When considered together with the additional nearby recently <br /> rezoned parcel whose owners' development request can be anticipated, the situation is <br /> even further exacerbated. <br /> In short, one simply can't drop a one acre lot subdivision on a piece of prime <br /> entialauses and expect there to be <br /> farmland in the middle of agricultural and multi-acre resid <br /> anything but ongoing significant detrimental effects and conflict. <br /> In addition, even a cursory analysis of the real estate market in the area discloses <br /> many Unsold houses and building lots. There is,currently no excess and Unmet demand for <br /> this type of development and the lots contemplated. Thus, there is absolutely no benefit to <br /> counteract these many, varied, and significant adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. <br /> We, as do the vast majority of the Morada residents, vigorously oppose this <br /> proposal for the reasons outlined above together with others:that do not come to mind. If <br /> allowed, this development will have substantial adverse effects on the environment and <br /> quality of life in this area. Further, this will have been done for no good societal benefit or <br /> need. <br /> Very ruly yours, <br /> LL <br /> William and Karen Hale <br /> 8901 Hildreth Lane <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.