My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y <br /> SECTION I <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> ' A. PURPOSE <br /> This Supplemental EIR is an expansion of the Final EIR <br /> (dated June. 1988) for the proposed Morada Meadows project (GPA-87- <br /> 16, ZR-r87-35 and SU-87-23) pursuant= to CEQA. Under CEQA <br /> guidelines, Section 15163, a supplement to an EIR shall be <br /> prepared if: <br /> 1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would <br /> require the preparation of a subsequent EIR; and, <br /> 2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to <br /> make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in <br /> the changed situation. <br /> The purpose of this Supplement is to provide a reasonable <br /> analysis of an alternative site for the proposed project. This <br /> analysis will compare the environmental effects of and restraints <br /> on the alternative site with those effects and restraints <br /> pertaining to the proposed site. Three additional alternatives to <br /> f the proposed project were discussed in Section VII of the Final <br /> EIR. These alternatives included: no project, the project at a <br /> lower planned density with 5 to 10-acre parcels, and the project <br /> with public sewer, water and drainage services. , <br /> The alternative site was selected for analysis because of <br /> its location within -the Morada Rural Residential planning area, <br /> its proximity to the project site, and its ability to accommodate <br /> a project of the size proposed. This alternative is reasonable <br /> . from a land use perspective, although it may not be available for <br /> h immediate development. The current status of the availability of <br /> the alternative site is not to be used as the primary basis for <br /> its consideration. A recent California Court of Appeals decision <br /> f (88 C.DOS. 493-1988, Citizens of Goleta v. Board of Supervisors) <br /> _ states, "Serving the public purpose at minimal environmental <br /> expense is the goal of CEQA. Ownership of the land used and the <br /> identity of the developer are factors of lessor importance. " <br /> Should it be determined that a public purpose will indeed be <br />' served by the proposed project, the decision-making body must then <br /> weigh any environmental consequences caused by the project and <br /> compare the possible consequences should the project be located at <br /> an alternative site. <br /> The Final EIR as revised by the Supplemental EIR shall be <br /> considered by the decision-making body when deciding whether to <br /> f approve the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA, a finding under <br /> Section 15091 shall be made for each significant effect shown in <br /> the Final EIR as revised by this Supplemental EIR. <br /> L <br /> k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.