My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. TRAFFIC <br /> /CIRCULATION <br /> b The alternative site is located south of Ashley Lane between <br /> Alhambra Avenue and Hildreth Lane. Access into the alternative <br /> site would be gained directly off of Ashley Lane which runs inaneast/west direction. Hildreth Lane also is oriented in an <br /> east/west direction until intersecting Alhambra Avenue. From this <br /> point the roadway turns in a northeasterly direction. Alhambra <br /> Avenue travels in a north/south direction and is situated just <br /> west of the Central California Traction Line Railroad tracks. All <br /> three of these streets are two lanes wide and are located ,east of <br /> State Route 99. <br /> i <br /> Based on discussions with San Joaquin County staff and the <br /> : location of the proposed alternative site, it was determined that <br /> the following five intersections would be studied for potential <br /> increases in traffic: <br /> 1. East Frontage/Ashley i <br /> 2. East Frontage/SR 99 NB Ramps <br /> 3 . East Frontage/Morada <br /> 4. West Frontage/Morada <br /> 5. West Frontage/SR 99 SB Ramps <br /> Both AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were <br /> conducted at the intersections to determine existing LOS. As <br /> �.- calculated, all five stop sign controlled intersections are <br /> functioning at LOS "A" during the AM and PM peak hour. <br /> Vehicle trip generation for the alternative project site <br /> would be based on the single-family designation of 31 single- <br /> family dwelling units (based on the net number of parcels allowed <br /> on the alternative site) . The following are based on calculations <br /> from the initial project site. <br /> ' 1 31 Single-Family Dwell:n Units <br /> 1. 31 units x 10.1 trips/unit = 313 daily trips <br /> 2. 31 units x 0.75 trips/unit = 23 AM trips (6 in, 17 out) <br /> 3. 31 units x 1.01 trips/unit = 31 PM trips (20 in; 11 out) <br /> Overall vehicle distribution was based on existing traffic <br /> flows on Ashley Lane and East Frontage Road. Approximately <br /> 35 <br /> percent of the alternative site's traffic would be to/fromthe <br /> north on East Frontage Road. Another 40 percent of the <br /> alternative site's traffic would be to/from the south on East <br /> Frontage Road as well. Of the remaining 25 percent of the <br />'� 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.