My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Pesticide Information <br /> Several different types of pesticides, herbicides and <br /> fumigants could be expected to be used in the project vicinity . <br /> This will depend on several factors : time of year, weather and <br /> type of pest infestation. At the time the chemicals are applied, <br /> other faccois must be considered. These include method of <br /> application, weather conditions, toxicity and whether the chemical <br /> is dust, granular or spray form. The above factors will also <br /> relate to how the chemical may affect humans as a result of <br /> chemical drift. Agricultural chemicals are classified as <br /> "restricted" and "non-restricted . " If restricted chemicals are <br /> used , the farmer must obtain a permit to apply the chemical . <br /> When issuing the permit, the San Joaquin County Agricultural <br /> Commissioner ' s office must consider several factors including <br /> proximity of residences, adjoining land uses, and wind direction. <br /> Restrictive pesticides would require a "Restrictive Materials" <br /> permit while non-restrictive pesticides, such as sulphur dust, <br /> would not require a permit . Examples of restricted pesticides <br /> include 2, 4-D, Paraquat, Simazine and Parathion . These are liquid <br /> herbicides or pesticides that can be applied either on the ground <br /> or aerially . Restricted soil fumigants ( injected 6-24 inches into <br /> the soil ) include Systox , Metholobromide and Telone. Other <br /> restricted pesticides used as grain bait are placed underground <br /> and used for rodent control . These include Aluminum Phosphide, <br /> Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine . $ <br /> The Deputy County Agricultural Commissioner indicated that <br /> most of the orchard applications in this area are applied with <br /> sprayer equipment attached to platforms that are pulled throughi <br /> the orchards. Very little aerial spraying by plane or helicopter <br /> is done with orchard crops . 9 The applicant stated that helicopter <br /> spraying was used for treating the sugar beet crop and that nearby a <br /> residents are notified when the spraying will be undertaken. 10 <br /> C . Soil Types <br /> Th U. S. Soil Conservation Service has identified two soil <br /> types on the project site. These include CL-CLear Lake clay <br /> hardpan substratum, and ST-Jacktone clay . The Clear Lake clay is <br /> considered prime agricultural soil and includes +/- 46 acres. The <br /> northern two-thirds of the project site is considered Clear Lake <br /> clay , while the southern one-third portion is Jacktone clay . Both <br /> soils present constraints relative to sewage and drainage systems <br /> as discussed in Section V.B. <br /> 2. Environmental Impacts <br /> Development of the project site would result in the <br /> conversion of +/-62 acres of agricultural land (net amount after <br /> deducting existing residences - approximately 4 . 5 acres) into <br /> urban uses. In 1986 the County Agricultural Report stated that <br /> 659 , 150 acres had been harvested compared to 686, 110 in 1985. <br /> Conversion of the project site would represent a . 0010 percent <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.