My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> 2 <br /> Summate <br /> Several potential inconsistencies have been discussed which <br /> should be considered prior to approving the General Plan <br /> Amendment. The Board of Supervisors must weigh the benefits of <br /> providing rural residential development with retaining prime <br /> agricultural land. It could be construed that the proposed <br /> project is merely an outward extension of an existing residential <br /> community . However, it should be noted that the proposed project <br /> would have a growth inducing effect by encouraging similar general <br /> plan amendment requests within the immediate study area and in the <br /> vicinity of the project site. In particular, several landowners <br /> surveyed indicated a desire to eventually sell or develop their <br /> property for residential use. Those landowners who wish to remain <br /> in agriculture will have a more difficult time maintaining their <br /> agricultural operations due to the many land use conflicts which <br /> arise when residential use encroaches into agricultural areas. <br /> on i.nZ <br /> 1 . Environmental Setting <br /> As shown in Figure 6, the existing County zoning for the <br /> project site is GA-40 (General Agriculture, 40 acre minimum) . The <br /> minimum parcel size for this zoning is 40 acres and the only <br /> permitted uses are agriculture and one, single-family dwelling per <br /> parcel . Under this zone classification, parcels of land with an <br /> area greater than 20 acres, may be divided with an area less than <br /> the minimum area required for the zone for the purpose of 1 ) <br /> providing a residence for an owner-operator of an agricultural <br /> enterprise or members of such family , 2 ) creating a homesite for <br /> an owner-operator of an agricultural enterprise to retain an <br /> existing residence and sell the remaining property for <br /> agricultural use. Other uses are permitted with a use permit. <br /> Under existing zoning and individual parcel ownership, six homes <br /> would be permitted . <br /> Zoning in the area is mainly agriculture with the Morada Area <br /> designated as Rural Residential . Directly across Foppiano Lane to <br /> the south of the project site the land is zoned EA (Exclusive <br /> Agriculture) . It is the intent of this zone "to deter developers <br /> from considering lands in this zone as potential urban <br /> subdivision property ; to provide protection to existing and future <br /> agricultural land uses from restrictions instituted at the request <br /> of future residents, and to encourage the highest and best use of <br /> the lands_ so classified for agricultural purposes. " rands in <br /> this zone are primarily planted in orchards and row crops. <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.