My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r) <br />` TABLE 4 <br /> t <br /> EXISTING + PROJECT LEVELS OF SERVICE -. AH AND PH PEAK HOUR <br /> INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LOS <br /> AM PM <br /> West Frontage/SR 99 SB ramps A C <br /> West Frontage/Hammer E* "F* <br /> East Frontage/Hammer A A <br /> East Frontage/SR 99 .NB ramps A D* <br /> East Frontage/Foppiano A A <br /> Hildreth/Alhambra (West) A A i <br /> Hildreth/Alhambra (East) A A <br /> � <br /> Refers to delay experienced by traffic stopped on the West <br /> Frontage Road and SR 99 northbound off—ramp approached to these <br /> intersections. Traffic flows along Hammer Lane and East Frontage <br /> ► Road are operating at LOS "C" or better. <br /> Streets such as Hildreth Lane, Canepa Road and Foppiano Lane <br /> would continue to function as rural residential streets. <br /> Increases in vehicle traffic from the proposed project would not <br /> strain their existing capacity . Occasionally, vehicles from the <br /> project would encounter agricultural traffic and experience small <br /> delays traveling to/from the project site. <br /> 5 . C mu at 've _Develonme tThe . <br /> effects Of, c u ati e e tb e a zed <br /> under two spate scenarios : have <br /> �k <br /> 't o sed" o "planned" o 'ect tha t would hp located <br /> in or around the immediate study area . <br /> dont he o t oc to Area. <br /> OS <br /> a d recommended mitigation meg.Luresa ee -taken <br /> Airectly from the North Stockton Cumulatiye Baleline <br /> TrafLic Stud <br /> A,_ C u ati e o e t in the Morada Rural Renidential <br /> Area <br /> Cumulative development in and around the project study area <br /> was considered. For the most part, projects in the "planning" or <br /> "proposed" stage are occurring outside the immediate study area. <br /> The following is a list of these projects with the potential to <br /> impact the surrounding street network : <br /> i <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.