SU0006613 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I U i -4- APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 4 "Two members of the Planning Commission voiced strong concern about the turn out for entering the school and church. The engineer for the Church stated he would have complete punts for the building permvote without seeinit. How can the commission $ he a full view of t turn outs, which they clearly had concerns about?How can they know if the engineers plans will meet with their approval?" RESPONSE TO APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 4 Pursuant to Development Title Section 9-1015.5(h)and as a condition of approval,the access points shall have a width of no less than twenty-five feet for two-way aisles. The proposed site plan indicates three access points,each with a minimum of 25 feet for two-way aisles and meets the Development Title's minimum access requirements. Furthermore, as a condition of approval (Condition 2. g.),the Department of Public Works will require a copy of the final site plan which demonstrates traffic circulation, staging, and entrance and exit plans relevant to inflow and outflow of vehicles during drop-off and pick up times of students prior to the release of building permits. The submitted site plan indicates adequate area for cars to stack off the public right of way to pick up and drop off students. APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 5 "There are five members on the planning commission board. There were only four members ' present on this action, this is a 30 to 50 million dollar project to be done over twenty years. The staff report stated this was to be done in four phases, which the Church requested this be reduced to two phases. With no notification to anyone involved or affected by this." RESPONSE TO APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 5 The applicant had originally requested that the project have four phases over a period of 30 years. However, the County generally limits phasing to around 15 years; the County will probably have a new General Plan, and possibly two, within 30 years. Also, the traffic study for this project only considered traffic projections to 2025. For these reasons, The Community Development Department recommended that the phasing be revised to 15 years. The applicant requested to revise the overall phasing to 15 years and that the originally proposed four phases be condensed to a total of two phases. The scope of the project, in reference to the overall size and square footage of the proposed structures, remained the same.