SU0006613 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i e _5_ APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 6 "One member of the committee voted to approve because there would be a teen center. In Father Peters Statement to the Board, this project has wish lists in it,the teen center being one of them. So this Member as voting for something on a wish list not the whole project. What if the teen center never happens, would that change his vote?" RESPONSE TO APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 6 As contained in the minutes for the Planning Commission hearing from 0311912009, Commissioner Villapudua stated that the proposed youth center is a good idea. APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 7 "A email was sent to the Board to be read during the meeting, opposing the project, by a neighbor. The email was not read because the neighbor did not live in the 1400 square foot radius of the project. She lives about 3, 000 feet away, and would be directly affected daily by this project. People from the city of Stockton were able to voice their opinions in favor of the project. This meeting was open to the public, all public opinion should have been allowed. Stockton is not within the 1400 square foot radius." RESPONSE TO APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 7 r I A letter was received by the Community Development Department on 03/19/2009 from Mary Beth Baglione which requested a continuance on the Use Permit. The letter asked"that a continuance be granted in order for the property owners to adequately assess the impact of this proposed expansion and to respond at a later date." A copy of the letter was given to each z Planning Commissioner. As a result, a request for a continuance on the item was presented to the Planning Commission by the Director on behalf of Mrs. Baglione, The Planning Commissioners did not make a motion to grant Mrs. Baglione's request for a continuance and the item was heard. APPEAL STATEMENT NO. 8 1 "The traffic report was conducted in January of 2008.This is the slowest time of the year for recreational traffic on State Hwy 120 (according to the traffic impact report this is the major east west facility through Central California). It also did not take into account the transportation of any farming or harvesting equipment which is used basically May to November. This is an agricultural area with a multitude of different crops. And all using trucks to transport their products and equipment. State Hwy'l20 is the major recreational and commute route to Yosemite National Park and the foothills. Was this taken into consideration in the report? The I J ` J