Laserfiche WebLink
central Stockton. The location of the site is shown in Figure 1, <br /> and the site facilities are shown in Figure 2 . The site is located <br /> in a residential/commercial area, and the local topography is flat. <br /> A Chevron gasoline station was formerly located across Franklin <br /> r Street from the site, but has been demolished and is presently <br /> undergoing assessment of soil and groundwater contamination <br /> resulting from activities at that site. Groundwater monitoring data <br /> at that site indicate that groundwater flow is to the northeast, <br /> toward the Kwikee Foods site, and monitoring wells have been <br /> 5 drilled in Franklin Street near the Kwikee Foods property line <br /> (Figure 2 ) . <br /> 2 .2 Previous Work <br /> A groundwater monitoring well was installed near the dispenser <br /> island in 3990 . This well was originally labelled MW-1, but has <br /> been renamed KF-3 in this investigation. It is our understanding <br /> that Geological Technics performed routine groundwater monitoring <br /> of this well in April 1990 . Total petroleum hydrocarbons in the <br /> gasoline range .(TPH-g) were detected at a concentration of 81, 000 <br /> Ag/1 (ppb) , and benzene was detected at a concentration of 2, 107 <br /> ppb. Toulene, ethylbenzene, and xylene were . also detected at, <br /> elevated levels . , <br /> Subsequently, EHD requested furtherassessment of the extent of the <br /> i plume of contaminated groundwater, but no work was performed until <br /> monitoring wells KF-1 and KF-2 were installed by Soils Exploration <br /> Service 'under the supervision of Upgradient in December . 1994 . ' <br /> ' Neither well encountered significant soil contamination, but <br /> gasoline and aromatic hydrocarbons were detection above reporting <br /> limits in groundwater samples from both wells . Gasoline was also <br /> detected in KF-3 . Groundwater elevation data : indicated that " <br /> groundwater flow was to the east. Upgradient recommended that <br /> monitoring continue on .a quarterly basis, and scheduled the next <br /> monitoring event for March, 1995 . <br /> 3 .0 MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> Monitoring took place on March 20, 1994. The wells were opened and <br /> the depth to groundwater was measured, using a Solinst water level <br /> meter. A two-stage submersible pump was used to purge the wells of <br /> standing water, which was deposited in a 55-gallon drum on the east <br /> side of the 'property. , During purging, - the temperature, pH, and <br /> conductivity of the water were measured at 5-gallon intervals with <br /> a Corning Checkmate meter until these parameters stabilized (see <br />` Appendix A) . To prevent cross-contamination, the pump was washed in <br /> a TSP solution between wells . After purging, samples were collected <br /> with a disposable . -plastic bailer and placed in 40-m1 vials . The <br /> vials were labelled and logged, placed in a cooled ice chest, and <br /> shipped to McCampbell Analytical for analysis . The chain-of-custody <br /> form and laboratory report are' included in Appendix S . <br /> 2 <br />