Laserfiche WebLink
(YA <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> On September 24 and October 2, 1996, Smith Technology conducted an additional subsurface <br /> investigation at the site. A total of nine soil borings were advanced to depths up to 15 feet below <br /> ground surface (bgs). Soil, soil vapor, and groundwater samples were collected from the borings. <br /> Analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples indicated the general extent of total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) in soil and groundwater under the site. Analytical results for geochemical <br /> parameters in soil and groundwater indicated bioremediation is occurring in the plume of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in groundwater beneath the site. Analytical results of soil vapor samples indicated the <br /> availability of oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and methane in the vadose zone. Also, results of <br /> laboratory geophysical testing on soil samples from the site indicated that the potential receptor on- <br /> site, the water supply well, would not be affected by the plume of petroleum hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater within the next 20 years, in the worst case. <br /> On March 9, 1999, ATC supervised the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells, MW-4, <br /> MW-5, and MW-6 (Figure 2). During installation of the monitoring wells, soil samples were <br /> collected from the borings. On March 11, 1999,ATC developed and sampled monitoring wells MW- <br /> 4, MW-5, and MW-6. Analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples collected at the site <br /> indicated the lateral extent of impacted soil and groundwater had been defined. Refer to ATC's <br /> Summary Report Additional Subsurface Investigation, 7675 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, California, <br /> dated May 12, 1999,for additional information. <br /> Based on historical data and a verbal discussion with Mr. Ron Rowe of EHD, ATC submitted a <br /> closure report request dated June 27, 2000. EHD did not formally respond to the report but instead <br /> requested that ATC perform another monitoring event. In a letter dated October 2, 2001, Ms. Dot <br /> Lofstrom of the EHD requested computer modeling of the groundwater plume be conducted. ATC <br /> evaluated contaminant migration potential of affected soil and groundwater at the site using the <br /> EPA's BIOSCREEN (v.1.4) software program. The results of the computer modeling indicated the <br /> petroleum impacted soil and groundwater at the site do not appear to be an immediate and significant <br /> threat to human health or the environment. The computer modeling results are presented in ATC's <br /> Addendum to Additional Site Evaluation and Request for No Further Action for Fayette <br /> Manufacturing Corporation, dated November 4, 2002. <br /> In April 2004, ATC conducted additional investigation activities to evaluate the vertical extent of <br /> impacted soil in the vicinity of the former USTs and to evaluate the potential presence of petroleum <br /> impacted groundwater between MW4 and MW5. The results of the additional investigation activities <br /> indicate the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil was adequately defined. Petroleum impacted <br /> groundwater was identified in the vicinity of the former USTs and between MW4 and MW5. Refer to <br /> ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface Investigation, 7675 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, <br /> California, dated August 11, 2004, for additional information. <br /> s:\17861\reports\wellinstwkpin.doc 2 <br />