My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010865
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
8181
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544805
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010865
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:07 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 2:10:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010865
RECORD_ID
PR0544805
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005204
FACILITY_NAME
GENSTAR WESTERNSTONE PRODUCTS
STREET_NUMBER
8181
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25014005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8181 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1992 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Western Stone Products, Tracy, California <br /> =i Page 2 <br /> Depth to groundwater measured in wells MWl, MW2, MW3 and MW4 was subtracted from <br /> wellhead elevation to determine groundwater elevation (Table 1). Water levels in October had <br /> dropped approximately 0.8 feet since last measured in July 1992. Figure 2 depicts the <br /> groundwater gradient on October 7, 1992. Gradient magnitude was approximately 0.004 ft/ft <br /> or 21 ft/mile in a north-northwesterly direction. Monitoring data is presented in Attachment 1. <br /> On October 7, 1992, after purging and stabilization of pH, conductivity, and temperature <br /> groundwater samples were collected from downgradient wells MW3 and MW4. Disposable <br /> bailers were used to collect the samples. Purge logs are included in Attachment 1. <br /> The groundwater samples were delivered to the Sequoia Analytical Mobile laboratory on site and <br /> analyzed for TPHD and BTEX utilizing EPA methods 3510/8015 and 503018020, respectively. <br /> No petroleum analytes were detected in the groundwater samples collected from wells MW3 and <br /> MW4. Table 2 summarizes analytical results. Attachment 2 contains laboratory data sheets, <br /> and chain-of-custody documentation. <br /> EXCAVATION AND SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> Source removal excavation activities were conducted on October 7, 8, and 9, 1992, under the <br /> direction of Mr. Gregory P. Stahl and a field geologist. Approximately 375-400 cubic yards of <br /> soil were removed. The former diesel tank pit was opened to an approximate depth of 14 feet <br /> below grade (5-6 feet below groundwater) in order to remove contaminated soil previously found <br /> to exist above and below the water table. Excavation continued until photoionization detector <br /> readings and visual and olfactory evidence indicated that no petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination remained on the northern, eastern and southern sides of the pit. To verify <br /> complete removal of the petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils, confirmation samples were <br /> collected from the three "clean" sides of the excavation. The western wall of the former tank <br /> pit was excavated to the maintenance structure flooring edge. Samples were collected from the <br /> western wall to determine the level and extent of contamination left in place. Depicted on <br /> Figure 3 is the extent of excavation and the locations of the soil samples collected from the <br /> sidewalls. The confirmation soil samples were analyzed for TPHD and BTEX by the Sequoia <br /> Analytical mobile laboratory. Sample analysis indicated that petroleum hydrocarbon impacted <br /> soils were totally removed from the northern, eastern and southern walls of the tank pit. <br /> Complete removal of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils from the west wall was not possible <br /> because impacted soils were beneath the maintenance shed and further excavation in this <br /> direction would have threatened the footings of the structure. Sol] sample analytical results are <br /> QR102592.FNL <br /> t <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.