My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ESCALON
>
1329
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2019 4:53:54 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 4:27:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544806
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000293
FACILITY_NAME
Pershing Holdings, Inc. DBA Esclon Arco
STREET_NUMBER
1329
STREET_NAME
ESCALON
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Escalon
Zip
95320
APN
22510003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1329 Escalon Ave
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC r1EALTH SERVICES aPA�I <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer c�,• �r <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue,Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 2091468-3420 FILE <br /> COPY <br /> DOUG STIDHAM <br /> CITY OF ESCALON APR 2 0 1999 <br /> P O SOX 248 <br /> ESCALON CA 95320 <br /> RE- South County Food and Fuel, ARCO SITE CODE: 1487 <br /> 1305 Escalon Ave. <br /> Escalon CA 95320 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHSIEHD) <br /> has reviewed the "Work Plan, Soil & Groundwater Investigation, Groundwater Monitoring <br /> & Feasibility Study" dated March 31, 1999,that was prepared by Geological Technics <br /> Inc. (GTI) for the above referenced site, and has the following comments. <br /> The work plan proposes the installation of six wells. Three monitoring wells (MW-1, <br /> MW-2 and MW-3) will be installed to encounter first ground water, screened from 55-75 <br /> feet below surface grade (bsg). One deep monitoring well (MW-101) will be installed <br /> and discretely screened from 102.5-105 feet bsg. And two soil vapor extraction wells will <br /> be installed, one screened from 40-55 feet bsg (VEW-1), and the other screened from <br /> 12-27 feet bsg (VEW-2). All of the wells will be built with piping connecting them to the <br /> soil vapor extraction and treatment equipment, which will be located in a secured area <br /> on the north side of the existing on-site building. The piping will be located in trenches <br /> underground, and the wells will be covered with temporary steel boxes to protect them <br /> while area road construction continues. <br /> In a conversation between GTI and PHSIEHD it was understood that the piping from <br /> each monitoring well would not actually be connected to any type of manifold system <br /> until such time as it is decided that soil vapor extraction will be the remediation method <br /> used at this site. For the pilot test, the monitoring wells will be used to test for radius of <br /> influence. The piping from each well will be capped off and individually gauged during <br /> the test. <br /> The work plan proposes that the two vapor extraction wells be located in what is the <br /> current sidewalk on the eastern side of the property, and that MW-3 be located off site. <br /> These locations will place the wells in the future roadway. PHSIEHD understands the <br /> reason for this is to have the wells, and more importantly the piping lines, in place before <br /> the new road is built. This will hopefully avoid the necessity of tearing up the new road. <br /> While this placement will also provide information on the eastern lateral extent of the <br /> contaminant plume, PHSIEHD is concerned that the vapor extraction wells will be <br /> approximately 30 feet from the area which had the highest documented levels of soil <br /> contamination. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin Counry Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.