Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion of Soil Lithology <br /> Based on the soil observed in the borings, there appears to be poor to moderate <br /> potential for percolation in the shallow soil zones and moderate potential for percolation <br /> in the deep soil zones at the test locations. Sandy soils generally have a much greater <br /> potential for percolation than fine-grained or cemented soils. However, a percolation J <br /> test is the only accepted method for determining the suitability of the soils for a septic <br /> disposal area. Percolation test results are discussed in the following section. <br /> Percolation Test <br /> Shallow percolation tests were conducted on proposed Parcels 1 through 5 and 8 of the <br /> Site. Shallow and deep percolation tests were conducted on proposed Parcels 6, 7 and <y 2S <br /> 9 through 15 of the Site. The soil borings discussed above were used for the <br /> percolation test holes (Plate 10). Percolation test procedures conformed to San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy. <br /> Preparation and Presaturation of Percolation Test Holes <br /> After the borings were advanced by hand auger and the soils logged, the test holes <br /> were completed for the percolation tests. Approximately one inch of pea gravel was <br /> placed in the bottom of each open soil boring, followed by a 1.5-inch diameter PVC pipe <br /> with perforations on the bottom. Pea gravel was then used to backfill a few inches of <br /> the annular space. <br /> Live Oak presaturated the percolation test holes approximately 24 hours prior to the <br /> percolation tests. Each hole was filled with water to a height of 12 inches above the <br /> bottom of the boring for the presaturation. On the day of testing, the holes were found <br /> to be intact; all the holes were dry except the shallow holes on Parcels 10, 12, 13, 14, <br /> and 15. <br /> Percolation Test Procedure <br /> Live Oak conducted the percolation tests for the borings on September 11, 12, and 18, <br /> and December 31, 2014, and on January 8, 21, and 27, 2015. Due to soil conditions <br /> observed, four-hour tests were selected. Water level measurements were taken every <br /> 30 minutes during this four-hour period. The tests were observed by Michael Escotto, <br /> Ted Tasiopoulos, or Frank Girardi, Senior Registered Environmental Health Specialists <br /> at the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. <br /> An electronic well sounder with a depth accuracy of 1/100`h foot was utilized for the <br /> water level measurements. The water level was measured against a fixed reference <br /> point on the well casing. Measurements were recorded on the data sheet in decimal <br /> feet. When necessary after measuring the water level, the hole was refilled with water <br /> to a level of six inches or more above the bottom of the hole. <br /> LOGE 1419 Page 9 <br />