Laserfiche WebLink
Jan • 10, 2006 2 : 24PM CA DEPARTMENT or"T,RANSPORTATION No- 4692 P . 4/4 <br /> Ms. Allen <br /> January 9,2006 <br /> " Page 3 <br /> 1 <br /> It must be determined if grading would divert drainage from this proposed project and <br /> result in increased runoff to existing State facilities. This will not be allowed. <br /> * All lighting (including reflected sunlight) within this project should be placed and/or <br /> shielded so as not to be hazardous to vehicles traveling on State facilities. <br /> • The Department will not be held responsible for any noise impacts to this <br /> development, including from the configuration of the Ultimate Transportation <br /> Concept(UTC) for SR-89. A noise study should be completed to analyze federal <br /> requirements and be based on 20-year traffic projections and the UTC of the State <br /> facility, If there is a noise impact, the developer has the responsibility to provide the <br /> mitigation. <br /> * This proposed development may not create a major impact on SR-88°when considered <br /> by itself. However, when combined with the cumulative impacts of other existing and <br /> proposed development in this area, the resulting traffic will contribute to the <br /> significant congestion forecasted to the SR-88 mainline and at the intersections with <br /> Sierra Drive and Mira Vista Lane. Therefore,the Department recommends the <br /> collection of impact;fees on a"Fair Share" basis for future improvements to these <br /> facilities. <br /> If you have any questions or would like to discuss our comments in more detail,please <br /> contact Dan Brewer at (209) 948-7142 (e-mail: dan.brewerQdgt.ca.gov) or me at(209) <br /> 941-1921. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> TOM DUMAS, Chief <br /> Office of intermodal Planning <br /> "Caltrans improves moW ily nowt California' <br />