Laserfiche WebLink
FJ � n <br /> FI FIELD INVES raAI-IQN <br /> The following information was obtained during a field investigation of the site as <br /> Fwell as interviewing the property owners and tenants. <br /> The site contains no septic systems of record on the entire 14.06 acre parcel. <br /> However, there is a septic system on site. There are agricultural and domestic <br /> wells. There are not plans for homes to be built. However, there will be public <br /> water and sewer serviced to the site which will be commercial, as shown by the <br /> will serve letter from Lockeford Community Services District (see Appendix). <br /> According to the owner, there are no buried tanks on the property. There are not <br /> visual signs of any such tanks (ground settling, irregular ground, etc.) <br /> There is no pond to retain storm runoff from the 14.06 acre parcel. The runoff <br /> r percolates into the ground or flows to the existing roadside ditch. <br /> As previously stated, the majority of the site has been farmed with walnuts. <br /> I_ Roundup has historically been used as a weed killer. This has been used in <br /> accordance with the manufactures recommendations, but was applied without a <br /> license. <br /> 1 <br /> The depth to groundwater in this vicinity is approximately 100 feet. This relatively <br /> deep groundwater does not typically become severely impacted by pesticides, { <br /> insecticides, or fertilizers. The soil type is generally clay and sandy loam which is I <br /> generally a deterrent to groundwater contamination compared to other types of <br /> soils. The types of products used on this site are consistent with the surrounding <br /> property. <br /> According to the land owner, there are no known pesticide containers buried on <br /> the property. A visual inspection did not produce any evidence of buried <br /> containers. The field investigation also did not yield any unusual (noxious) orders. <br /> QQNCLUSIONND RECOMMENDATION <br /> Based on visual observation, County records, and testimony of the property <br /> owners, there appears to be no surface contamination. Given the scope of this <br /> l r study, the probability of subsurface contamination should be considered low and <br /> normal to this region. Based on visual observation, no corrective action is <br /> necessary at this time. <br /> 11i. <br /> -2- <br /> Ii <br /> 1 <br />