Laserfiche WebLink
L SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY <br /> REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title n <br /> Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> SuSufficient SITE LOCATION: REPORT DATE: <br /> ImInsufficlesufflelent <br /> 1 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ICS Description of site,including zoning information. <br /> [�] ❑ Description of proposed development.l,.. 'tom -��y„� (,11-IJ,�,�.Q <br /> ❑ Parcel location map. r• <br /> ❑ N' Site map showing location of all items on parcel (structures,drives,wells,septic systems, large trees, pastures, <br /> pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways,etc.) <br /> PRESENT AND PAST USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑ R-71 Discussion of past and present uses at the site to assess potential problems. <br /> EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK USAGE SECTION <br /> ❑ EU Description of existing septic tank usage on site(system types,age,functioning/repair rates). <br /> E!❑ Site septic permit history(number/types/dates of permits,age of system,permit numbers cooie )• <br /> F ❑ Discussion of on-site septic tank repair history. <br /> C ❑ Description of existing septic tank usage in the general area(system types,ages,functioning/repair rates, proximity to <br /> parcel). <br /> ❑ General area septic permit history(number/types/dates of permits,age of system, permit numbers, copies in <br /> L i� Elreport). <br /> Discussion of general area septic tank repair history. <br /> S ❑ FI Description of proposed or expected maximum(including second unit dwellings)septic tank usage on site. <br /> GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SECTION Q <br /> ❑ Description of the depth and A&nt of groundwater in the general area. i5 p r w <br /> ��� ❑ Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the site. <br /> Description of location(address/APN),type and construction of well,and location(well head/kitchen tap)where <br /> F� water samples were obtained. <br /> Description of constituents being tested for in the water sample. <br /> Description of how sample was obtained, handled,stored,and transported to the lab.. <br /> Complete Chain of Custody document, including printed and signed name of third party sampler,condition of <br /> sample,and date and time the sample was submitted to the lab. <br /> SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ j Site showing the location,with dimensions,of the soil profile pitr�he parcel. 5,1 , I tZl b <br /> ❑ fL�1 escription of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions. e <br /> (',�h <br /> ❑ escription of soil lithology as noted from test pit by appropriate professiona using industry standard protocol. <br /> ❑ Discussion of soil lithology as related to future onsite septic uses. <br /> PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ Site map showina the location.with concise and accurate dimensions,of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> 1� ❑ The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests were performed for each parcel. <br /> ElDescription of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole,including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole,and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inches). <br /> ❑ Description of the date,time and edition of the test hole after the 24 hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br /> depth to water remaining in hole,etc.). <br /> ❑ The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02(correct depth,diameter,2"gravel,6"water refill,correct readings <br /> recorded). <br /> ❑ Complete(including readings) Percolation Test Form was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate was <br /> correctly calculated using the last reading. <br /> r ❑ Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> i ❑ Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type and size of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual. <br /> REVIEWED BY: <br /> REVIEWED DATE: <br />