My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005937
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FOX
>
17142
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600066
>
SU0005937
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:55 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005937
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600066
STREET_NUMBER
17142
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FOX
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05119024
ENTERED_DATE
3/7/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17142 N FOX RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/12/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FOX\17142\PA-0600066\SU0005937\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FOX\17142\PA-0600066\SU0005937\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FOX\17142\PA-0600066\SU0005937\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FOX\17142\PA-0600066\SU0005937\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendations <br /> Action <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Approve the Negative Declaration; and <br /> 2. Approve the Revisions of Approved Actions for the previously approved Major Subdivision <br /> Application No. PA-0200098 with the Findings and Revised Conditions of Approval contained in <br /> the staff report. <br /> Findings for Revisions of Approved Actions <br /> 1 There are changes in circumstances which make any or all of the conditions of the Tentative Map or <br /> Vesting Tentative Map no longer appropriate or necessary. <br /> • This Finding can be made because it was not known what housing design would be used at <br /> the time of submittal of the Major Subdivision. All previous conditions of Approval will be <br /> included in the Revised Conditions of Approval. The change of circumstance is that <br /> Development Title Section 9-310.5(b) is now needed so that one of the four single-family <br /> residences proposed for this subdivision can fit on the lot and meet the setback <br /> requirements. <br /> 2 The conditions of the Tentative Map or the Vesting Tentative Map shall conform to the provisions of <br /> Chapter 9-857, if a Major Subdivision, or the provisions of Chapter 9-860, if a Minor Subdivision <br /> • This Finding can be made because this Revisions of Approved Actions was reviewed for <br /> conformity with the provisions of Chapter 9-857 (Major Subdivisions) and all applicable <br /> requirements of the Division were met, including Review Procedures and Findings (see <br /> Findings for Major Subdivision, below). A five-year Time Extension was approved to extend <br /> the original thirty-six month approval. The application did not include a Vesting Tentative <br /> Map. <br /> Findings for Maior Subdivision <br /> 1 The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific <br /> Plan, and Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • This finding can be made because the R/L (Residential-Low Density) General Plan <br /> designation and R-L zoning conditionally permit the subdivision with an approved Major <br /> Subdivision application. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of <br /> the General Plan. Specifically, it meets the General Plan requirements of 2-6 dwelling units <br /> per gross acre (General Plan Volume I, Table III-1). There are no Master Plans, Specific <br /> Plans, or any other plans for the area that the subdivision would need to comply with. The <br /> Revisions of Approved Actions is consistent with the Oakwood Lake Special Purpose plan <br /> adopted in 2001. The Oakwood Lakes Special Purpose Plan provides for a variety of uses, <br /> one of which is single-family residences. A change in the setback requirements for corner <br /> lots does not conflict with the requirements or conditions of the Special Purpose Plan. The <br /> Revisions of Approved Actions is consistent with Development Title Section 9-310.5(b), and <br /> the Development Title is consistent with the General Plan. <br /> San Joaquin County PA-0200098\Beck Properties <br /> Community Development Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.