My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005732 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREDERICK
>
23073
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500714
>
SU0005732 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:43 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:39:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005732
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500714
STREET_NUMBER
23073
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
FREDERICK
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
22813021
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
23073 S FREDERICK RD
RECEIVED_DATE
10/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FREDERICK\23073\PA-0500714\SU0005732\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KLEINFELDER <br /> Nitrate Loading Study Comments <br /> Section 1.2 Page three of Study describes soil textures but does not describe how <br /> these soils will affect nitrate movement through soil. The near surface soils at the <br /> project site are moderately permeable (silty sand and sand with silt) and therefor(e are <br /> not likely to inhibit nitrate movement through the soil. Accordingly, a factor of 0.15�was <br /> selected as the percent denitrification of leach field effluent in the nitrate loading <br /> calculation in the referenced report. <br /> Section 2.3 Study must include verification that owner has made application for a <br /> wastewater discharge permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> in order to legally discharge wastewater into the retention pond. Notle Associates, Inc <br /> has prepared a study titled 'Technical Memorandum For Evaluation Of Wastewater <br /> Disposal', for the subject property owner in May 2005. As part of this study, <br /> recommendations are made for wastewater discharge improvements at the subject <br /> project site. It is our understanding the report has been forwarded to the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board and waste discharge requirements are pending. <br /> Section 3.3 Study does not include data nor discusses as to the constitutes of the <br /> 160,000 gallons/month of wastewater that enters the detention pond. The Study must <br /> discuss how nitrates included in this wastewater may affect the nitrate-nitrogen (N) in <br /> the groundwater. As stated in the above referenced report by Nolte Associates, the <br /> wastewater, from corn peeling, steeping, and cooking operations, drains to an <br /> approximate 404,000-gallon detention pond. It is our understanding that the wastewater <br /> contains small amounts of starch, citric acid, and lime. — <br /> The current groundwater flow direction on the site is generally towards the west. Two <br /> groundwater monitoring wells are located downgradient of the wastewater ponds and <br /> two monitoring wells are located upgradient of the wastewater ponds. To date nitrate as <br /> N has only been detected in one downgradient monitoring well (MW-3) with <br /> concentrations ranging from 0.5 mg/I to 1.5 mg/I:, The nitrate as N concentrations <br /> upgradient of the ponds ranges from 2 9 Tng/f to 7.8 mg/I. The MCL for nitrate as N is <br /> 10 mg/I. The shallow groundwater near the ponds does not appear to be affected by <br /> nitrate at this time. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> Kleinfelder has prepared this report in accordance with the generally accepted <br /> standards of care that exist in San Joaquin County at the time of writing. It should be <br /> recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic and chemical subsurface <br /> conditions are difficult. Judgments leading to conclusions and recommendations are <br /> generally made with an incomplete knowledge of the subsurface and/or historic <br /> conditions applicable to the site. The conclusions of this report are based on the <br /> information provided regarding the existing and proposed development and on-site <br /> conditions as well as our field observations, percolation test results, and experience in <br /> the project area. It was assumed that the percolation test results are representative of <br /> 50890.E02/STO6R1062 Page 2 of 3 <br /> Q 2006 Kleinfelder, Inc October 3, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.