SU0002983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESPONSE: Staff was unable to confirm the appellants statement that the Planning Commission had, at earlier hearings for projects on the owner's property, required that existing traffic problems would be corrected by the next development project submitted by the owner of the subject parcel. In addition, Conditions of Approval are developed based upon project related impacts, not those related to other projects or developments. 4. APPEAL STATEMENT: The appellant stated that the project should be denied because the Conditions of Approval did not 'restrict the utilization of exterior yards for storage purposes.' RESPONSE: The application stated that the reason for expanding the existing building was to provide additional storage; it did not contain a request for outside storage. The Conditions did not contain restrictions against outdoor storage because no outdoor storage was requested. Outdoor storage is not prohibited in the agricultural zone. The recommended action in the staff report includes a new Condition of Approval to address future outdoor storage on the project site. The recommended Condition states that such storage shall be consistent with Section 9-1022.4(e) of the Development Title, which pertains to special screening requirements for industrial projects. Those requirements address screening of storage materials from the view of adjacent properties and public rights-of-ways, screening materials, and the height of stored materials. 5. APPEAL STATEMENT: 'The Lot Line Adjustment does not provide the Uniform Building Code requirements for B-2 Occupancies and warehouses of unlimited areas.' RESPONSE: Lot Line Adjustment Application No. LA-95-29 was approved by staff on July 14, 1995, for the Ace Tomato Company to expand the subject parcel to permit an expansion of the California Hot Woods facility. Building Code requirements will be applied at the time the applicant submits a building permit application for the project. 6. APPEAL STATEMENT: The appellant states that the 'Lot Line Adjustment needs to be approved only in conjunction with the previously approved Minor Subdivision for the parcel to the west of the subject properties.' RESPONSE: Lot Line Adjustment Application No. LA-95-29 was approved by staff with applicable Ordinance requirements. That approval altered property lines created by two previous Minor Subdivision applications (PM-78-241 and PM-82-32). San Joaquin County SA-95-20/Ace Tomato Community Development Page 6