Laserfiche WebLink
C3eo(ogir,,dTwhnics 2nc. `... Page 4 <br /> City of Escalon <br /> Project No. 750.3 <br /> February 26,2001 <br /> 2.1.1 Excavation <br /> In September 1998, Wright Environmental Services Inc. (Wright)removed the former USTs <br /> at the site. Wright completed additional excavation around the former dispenser islands <br /> during December 1998. Approximately 213.55 tons (as documented on the landfill ticket) <br /> of impacted soils were subsequently hauled off site for disposal at the Manteca Forward <br /> Landfill on May 20, 1999. At that time, the extent of the gasoline contamination was <br /> undefined. <br /> On March 22, 1999, a meeting was held at the PHS/EHD with the City of Escalon's Mr. <br /> Doug Stidhain and GTI's Mr. Ray Kablanow in attendance. Further excavation was <br /> discussed at the meeting and PHS/EHD staff indicated that remediation activities conducted <br /> prior to plume definition would be classified as an "interim" remedial action. PHS/EHD <br /> staff further stated that interim remedial actions may not be subject to reimbursement from <br /> the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Program (USTCFP) and they required that <br /> the City of Escalon (City) state in writing its' responsibility for the costs of interim remedial <br /> actions. Mr. Stidham indicated that the City would not do additional work without USTCFP <br /> pre-approval. <br /> The participants also discussed the status of the road-widening project currently underway. <br /> PHS/EHD staff stated that the City could either continue the investigation (and delay the <br /> road construction activities) or delay the investigation. The City reiterated the need to <br /> complete the road project and a decision was made to defer the investigation. The <br /> - participants agreed that it was possible to install vapor extraction wells and/or groundwater <br /> •..� monitoring wells in the proposed roadway to facilitate future remedial activities. PHS/EHD <br /> staff documented the above synopsis in their March 26, 1999 letter. <br /> In their March 26, 1999 letter, it is apparent that PHS/EHD staff disagreed with further <br /> excavation as a remedial alternative. This is evident by their referring to the fact that soil <br /> contamination was present at a depth of 46 feet at the site and their conclusion that no <br /> shallow source of contamination was present in the area of the dispenser islands. Therefore, <br /> due to the following factors: <br /> V <br /> • the economic savings of continuing the shallow excavations while the equipment was <br /> mobilized in 1998 — 1999 has been forfeited, <br /> — • the contamination has been shown to extend to a depth of at least 46 feet at the site, <br /> • the existing transportation corridor existing at the site would be severely disrupted and <br /> at great costs to replace, <br /> excavation as a remedial alternative is rejected as technologically and economically <br /> infeasible. <br /> V <br /> 2.1.2. Remediation by Natural Attenuation <br /> Remediation by natural attenuation (RNA) is a process in which naturally occurring <br /> `+ mechanisms are utilized to reduce contaminant concentrations in the environment. These <br /> processes include aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation, volatilization, dispersion and <br /> absorption. Since the concentrations of contaminants leaching to groundwater at the site <br /> exceed the drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), it is apparent that RNA is <br /> V . <br /> V <br />