Laserfiche WebLink
CeologkdTechnics Inc. Page 5 <br /> City of Escalon <br /> Project No. 750.3 <br /> February 26,2001 <br /> not meeting the minimum cleanup goal established by PHS/EHD. Therefore, RNA as a <br /> remedial alternative is rejected as infeasible based on the historical groundwater data. <br /> 2.1.3. Soil Vapor Extraction <br /> Soil vapor extraction (SVE) has proven to be an effective in situ remedial method for soils <br /> of a permeable nature and can also be used to mitigate volatile hydrocarbons in groundwater <br /> by drawing air through permeable geologic units above the capillary fringe. <br /> Vapor extraction is the process of removing volatile organic compounds in the subsurface <br /> by drawing air through the subsurface sediments, which allow a transfer of chemical mass <br /> from the liquid state to the vapor state. As vapor, the chemicals are removed from the <br /> subsurface in the extraction air stream and destroyed aboveground via thermal oxidation. <br /> It has been shown by Beckett and Huntley (Ground Water Vol. 32, No. 2, March-April <br /> 1994, Published by the National Ground Water Association), that not only horizontal flow <br /> of air in the subsurface, but also vertical flow is an important component of soil vapor <br /> extraction remedial process. This is especially true for mitigation of low permeable units <br /> such as silts and clays. This site is primarily sand, which is coarse-grained sediment. <br /> In our March 31, 1999 work plan, GTI proposed the installation of two soil vapor extraction <br /> wells. PHS/EHD approved the work plan in their April 20, 1999 letter and a total of four <br /> SVE wells were subsequently installed on April 29–30, 1999. <br /> r 2.2 Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test Results <br /> In order to determine if the site is conducive to vapor extraction as a remedial alternative, <br /> Geological Technics Inc. drilled and installed four vapor extraction wells VEW-1 through <br /> VEW-4. The four (4) soil borings were drilled (2 to a depth of 55 feet and 2 to a depth of <br /> 27 feet) and converted into vapor extraction wells. The borings VEW-1 and VEW-2 were <br /> drilled at the eastern edge of the site, under the former sidewalk along the old <br /> Escalon/Bellota Road. The borings for VEW-3 and VEW-4 were drilled in the northern part <br /> of the excavation, adjacent to the northern dispenser island (see Figure 8). <br /> The vapor extraction wells were constructed using 4-inch diameter PVC casing with flush <br /> ,r threads. The table below shows the construction details. <br /> Well o. Dia./TD Screen Slot Filter Pack Trans. Grout Seal <br /> Seal <br /> _EW=I - '0-.U40" ea grave 3S_-55 –S6_-39'_VEW-2 - ea graveF-3 - 0= <br /> - 4- 3-54'— . eagrave - - - <br /> - <br /> . <br /> - 40_ Paeggraev_FT <br /> On June 12, 2000, the soil vapor pilot test was conducted utilizing a large capacity blower <br /> that was temporarily attached to one of the vapor extraction wells and activated. Vacuum <br /> pressure was monitored at the other vapor extraction wells and the three surrounding <br /> groundwater monitoring wells that had screened intervals exposed above the water table <br /> (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3). The wells had 4.5 to 5.5 feet of screen above the water table. <br /> V <br />