My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010965
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ESCALON
>
1329
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2019 8:46:59 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 8:18:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010965
RECORD_ID
PR0544806
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000293
FACILITY_NAME
Pershing Holdings, Inc. DBA Esclon Arco
STREET_NUMBER
1329
STREET_NAME
ESCALON
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Escalon
Zip
95320
APN
22510003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1329 Escalon Ave
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`r Geological Teckatcs lac. <br /> Well Abandonment Report Page 2 <br /> Project No.750.2 <br /> January 12,2006 <br /> On June 12, 2000, Ms. Lori Duncan of San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> (SJCEHD) requested in writing that a work plan be prepared to define the lateral and vertical <br /> extent of the groundwater plume at the site. On June 29, 2000, GTI prepared a work plan <br /> proposing the installation of two water table monitoring wells and one deep, discretely screened <br /> monitoring well. Ms Duncan approved the work plan on July 7, 2000. The work was performed <br /> during the week of October 16, 2000. <br /> On January 30, 2001, GTI prepared and submitted the Corrective Action Plan (Revised) Vadose <br /> Zone Remediation. The CAP discusses GTI's proposed methodology for mitigation of the <br /> documented petroleum hydrocarbon contamination at the site by vapor extraction. The CAP also <br /> discusses the confirmation testing outlined in this work plan. Ms Duncan approved the CAP, as <br /> submitted, in a letter dated April 02, 2001. <br /> In February 2002 the soil vapor extraction (SVE) system was initiated and has operated for <br /> approximately one year. On January 21, 2003, GTI submitted the Vapor Extraction Treatment <br /> System Monitoring Report. The report indicated that approximately 50% of the petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons contained in the subsurface have been removed, the groundwater at this site is free <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination, and possibly as much as 600 gallons of gasoline may <br /> remain in the vadose zone. The report also recommended that the site be considered for closure. <br /> In a letter dated February 18, 2003, SJCEHD requested that the well extraction cycle be utilized <br /> to address lower screen intervals and that GTI may consider switching methods of contaminant <br /> destruction, such as changing to carbon canisters to lower operational costs. <br /> V <br /> On March 28, 2003, GTI submitted the Additional Site Characterization - Soil Borings Work <br /> Plan. Ms Duncan approved the work plan, with reservation, in a letter dated April 8, 2003. The <br /> soil borings were advanced on September 5, 2003 and GTI submitted the resulting Interim Soil <br /> Investigation Report on October 2, 2003. As per the April 8, 2003 SJCEHD directive, the SVE <br /> system was restarted on December 9, 2003 and ran until January 14, 2004. <br /> V <br /> A new vapor extraction - granulated activated carbon (SVE-GAC) system was installed during <br /> the summer of 2004. The SVE-GAC was started on September 24, 2004 and ran until April 12, <br /> 2005. The SVE-GAC was not operational, due to repairs, for three weeks between December <br /> 2004 and January 2005. <br /> .. On May 16, 2005, GTI prepared and submitted a Risk Evaluation & Appendix B Site Closure <br /> Checklist recommending the COE site be considered for No Further Action. On July 13, 2005, <br /> SJCEHD submitted a Case Closure Summary to the CRWQCB. The CRWQCB concurred with <br /> SJCEHD's recommendations in a letter dated July 28, 2005. Both correspondences are included <br /> in Appendix B. <br /> In a letter dated August 3, 2005, SJCEHD requested a work plan for destruction of all <br /> groundwater monitoring and remediation wells at the site. On August 11, 2005, GTI submitted <br /> ..r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.