Laserfiche WebLink
i G¢ologua[Tecfinicsln� Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 750.2 <br /> December 20,200I <br /> �- Figure 2 shows the location of the well cluster used for calculating vertical groundwater <br /> gradient in this report, MW-1 and MW-101. Table 1 shows a Summary of Water Level and <br /> Gradients Slope and Bearing and Table 3 shows the calculated vertical gradients. The <br /> information used in the calculations is shown below. <br /> Vertical gradient calculation formulas are as follows: <br /> • vertical correction for gradient: [(gw gradient slope) x (distance) = vertical correction] <br /> • vertical head: [(head of deep well) - (head of shallow+ correction) = vertical head] <br /> • vertical gradient: [(vertical head)/(vertical distance) = vertical gradient] <br /> For the November 16, 2001 groundwater measurement, the vertical gradient was calculated <br /> for the MW-I/MW-101 pair. The vertical gradient was negative (a downward direction) <br /> +- and approximately two times greater than the water table horizontal gradient. <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On November 16, 2001, Don Light of Del-Tech mobilized to the site to conduct a <br /> groundwater monitoring event. The wells were first sounded for depth to water and then <br /> they were purged of at least three well volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra <br /> pump. Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH of the groundwater <br /> stabilized (<10% variation between three readings) indicating that formation water <br /> representative of aquifer conditions was entering the well. These water quality parameters <br /> were measured at intervals of each well volume purged. <br /> Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube. Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the transfer of the <br /> +-• sample to the VOA vials. Once the sample containers were filled and capped, the bottles <br /> were inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles. Each sample container was <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in an <br /> 'r ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory. All non-disposable sampling <br /> equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before and between uses. Disposable <br /> gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and were changed with each <br /> sampling event. <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and ensure their <br /> integrity. <br /> The purge water was placed in a 55 gallon DOT approved container, properly labeled and <br /> stored on site until its proper disposition can be arranged. <br /> Groundwater monitoring field logs are included in Appendix C. <br />