Laserfiche WebLink
�J GealogicaITerhnicslnc. Page 4 <br /> 1 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> 1 Project No. 750.2 <br /> December 20,2001 <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples collected on November 16, 2001, were delivered to Sherwood <br /> Labs Corporation of Hilmar, California (Department of Health Services Certification No. <br /> 1400), for analysis. <br /> i <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for: <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 8020/8015 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline(TPH-G)by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> I <br /> h Additional samples were sent to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc. from Sherwood Labs for the <br /> analysis of: <br /> • Fuel oxygenated compounds (MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME & TBA) by EPA method <br /> 8260 <br /> { The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A and the lab <br /> 1i data is presented in Appendix B. <br /> {'I As required under AB2886, the laboratory data was submitted electronically to GeoTracker <br /> on December 14, 2001- confirmation number 7775261580. <br /> { 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> { The results of the groundwater sample analyses show the following: <br /> • Well MW-1 has consistently contained low concentrations of gasoline range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH-G, BTEX). The concentration of TPH-G recorded for this event are <br /> slightly higher than those recorded during the August 2001 event. <br /> • Figure 6 illustrates groundwater elevation and TPH-G concentrations in MW-1 versus <br /> time. The graph had suggested a fairly direct relationship between groundwater <br /> elevation changes and contaminant concentrations. An inverse relationship was noted <br /> I for the November 2001 event, coinciding with the lowest groundwater elevation noted <br /> to date. <br /> • Figure 7 illustrates groundwater elevation and MTBE concentrations in MW-1 versus <br /> time. After an initial high of 220 4gll the concentrations of MTBE have fallen to 6.2 <br /> ug/l. <br /> • The discretely screened deep well MW-101 did not contain contaminant concentrations <br /> above the laboratory reporting limits for the third consecutive event. This suggests that <br /> the previously recorded contamination was a drilling artifact. <br /> • MW-5 was found to be free of contaminants except a low concentration of MTBE. <br />