Laserfiche WebLink
�../ 14+11 <br /> Environmental Impact Summary Letter Page 5 <br /> TEIXEIRA—SOUZA PROPERTY <br /> WKA No. 6504.07 <br /> Lead Results and Recommendations <br /> Based on recommendations made during the inspection of painted surfaces, a total of nine paint <br /> samples of suspect material were collected for analysis. The paint samples were collected from <br /> five of the single-family residences and from the milking house. Each sample was submitted <br /> under chain-of-custody to QuanTEM Laboratories for analysis by atomic absorption <br /> spectroscopy in accordance with EPA Method 7420. <br /> Lead was detected in one sample collected from a white door on Building 5 at a concentration of <br /> 0.061 percent by weight and in one sample collected from a metal hopper located west of the <br /> former milking house at a concentration of 0.208 percent by weight. The location and results of <br /> these samples is presented on Figure I attached to this Summary Letter. These levels of lead are <br /> not defined as lead-based paint by the US EPA or the California Department of Health Services. <br /> These two items can be disposed of as non-hazardous waste as long as the paint is not disturbed <br /> during demolition activities. To minimize the potential for the paint on these two items to <br /> become loose or flaky during demolition activities,their surfaces should be stabilized prior to <br /> demolition. Stabilization may consist of scrapping off the deteriorated areas of these structures <br /> and placing the removed material in a separate container for disposal as standard construction <br /> debris. <br /> Destructive testing within the structures was not conducted during the lead survey. All painted <br /> surfaces that are not currently visible must be presumed to be lead-based paint until proven <br /> otherwise. A detailed report presenting all results and recommendations from the lead survey <br /> will be forthcoming. <br /> WELL DESTRUCTION <br /> There are at let two ater supply wells and one groundwater monitoring well on the subject <br /> property that req ' e destruction in accordance with San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department(EHD) requirements. Figure 2 and Figure 3 presents the approximate location of each <br /> well. One water supply well is located south of the cluster of residences in a pump house,and one, <br /> possibly two,water supply wells are located just north of the former milking barn (Figure 3). The <br /> water supply well(s) located just north of the former milking barn may be a nested cluster of two <br /> wells possibly constructed in the same borehole based on well head piping and pressure tanks <br /> observed during Yield reconnaissance. The monitoring well is located west of the holding corrals <br /> along the fringe of the agricultural field (Figure 3). If during dairy demolition activities additional <br />