Laserfiche WebLink
I f 1 f I t s + I f f <br /> Table 2-1 (continued) <br /> Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures (Applicable to Program and Project-Specific Impacts) <br /> 5' — Significance Significance <br /> Mitigation Measure <br /> Impact <br /> before Mitigation after Mitigation <br /> 4.3-1b:General Plan Policies and Zoning—Conflicts with <br /> Adopted Policies of the Mountain House Master Plan(MHMP). <br /> o Implement Mitigation Measure 4.13.4. <br /> G <br /> N <br /> 4.3.2. General Plan Policies and Zoning—Consistency with LTS No mitigation required. LTS <br /> Land Use Designations of MHMP.The project would require <br /> changes to the MHMP land use map to allow development of the <br /> :2 new Delta College and other specific uses on the site.With the <br /> proposed amendments,the project uses would be consistent with <br /> o the new designations.A less-than-significant impact would occur. <br /> 4.33. General Plan Policies and Zoning—Consistency with LTS No mitigation required. LTS <br /> 5i San Joaquin County's Development Title and Zoning <br /> Designations.The project would include new zoning of the site, <br /> changing the existing Agriculture-Urban Reserve zoning <br /> designation to a variety of urban uses.This rezoning typically <br /> tb occurs at the time of adoption of a specific plan.The proposed <br /> zoning designations would be consistent with the County's General <br /> Plan and the MHMP and would not cause increases in the severity <br /> of impacts associated with the MHMP.A less-than-significant <br /> impact would occur. <br /> 4.4 Public Services <br /> 4.4-1.Public Services—Additional Demand for Public Parkland. LTS No mitigation required. LTS <br /> The proposed project would result in the construction of residences <br /> that would result in the demand for parks and recreational facilities. <br /> Sufficient neighborhood and community parks to serve project needs <br /> would be constructed as part of the project. San Joaquin County <br /> currently provides less than needed regional parkland in accordance <br /> with their standard,and the project would provide funding for less <br /> regional parkland than needed in accordance with County standards. <br /> According to the Mountain House Specific Plan II Initial Study, <br /> findings of the MHMP Final EIR concluded that adequate <br /> recreational facilities(e.g.,neighborhood parks,regional parks) <br /> C were provided by individual local facilities in each Specific Plan <br /> 9 mo area and that developers would pay for development and <br /> z � <br />