My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004916
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
18353
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500142
>
SU0004916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 9:43:57 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:44:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004916
PE
2638
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500142
STREET_NUMBER
18353
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
3/17/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18353 W GRANT LINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/15/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\18353\PA-0500142\SU0004916\COLLEGE PRK SP III.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
865
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pipelines do not represent a safety hazard unless their structural integrity is compromised, resulting in a <br /> release of natural gas or crude oil to the environment, and in rare cases,ignition of the product released. <br /> To assess the hazard posed by the pipelines, the pipeline risk analysis must identify: <br /> The events that could lead to a pipeline leakimpture and ignition of the product; <br /> The probability or frequency of such events; the consequences of such events; <br /> The annual individual risk(expressed as probability of being exposed to a fatal hazard over a one- <br /> year period) associated with leaks or ruptures and explosions at varying distances from the pipelines; <br /> and <br /> The recommended setbacks to avoid individual risks. <br /> The events that could lead to a pipeline leak or rupture include: third party dig-ins, corrosion or <br /> deterioration,weld or material defects, and ground movement. The events that could lead to the ignition <br /> of the product released include: sparks caused from metal saws or other equipment breaching the pipeline, <br /> mechanical equipment that create sparks as part of internal combustion,and open flame sources. <br /> The probability of such events was based on Federal Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline <br /> Safety(OPS)incident data.The consequences of such events was determined based on computer <br /> modeling performed by Quest Consultants,Inc.using the CANARY computer software hazards analysis <br /> package,which takes into account release conditions,ambient weather conditions, effects of local terrain, <br /> and mixture thermodynamics(see the pipeline risk analysis for a description of the modeling approach, <br /> modeled assumptions,and results).The consequences analysis evaluated the consequences of both <br /> contamination and explosion. With respect to contamination hazards,the analysis indicates that leakage <br /> or rupture of the Chevron crude oil pipeline(Pipeline CSFM 0499)could result in soil, surface water, and <br /> groundwater contamination,and that this contamination could result in exposure of people to toxic fumes <br /> or ingestion(if potable water wells or downstream drinking water surface water intakes were located in <br /> the vicinity). With respect to explosion hazards,the analysis estimates that the maximum downwind — <br /> hazard zone distance for a torch fire resulting from full rupture of the largest natural gas pipeline(the 36- <br /> inch PG&E natural gas pipeline,Pipeline L401)is 1,496 feet with immediate ignition and 912 feet with <br /> delayed ignition. Maximum torch fire,pool fire, and flash fire hazard zones would be smaller for the <br /> smaller diameter natural gas pipelines and for holes in the pipelines rather than full rupture. <br /> The annual individual risk associated with such events was determined by combining the likelihood of <br /> pipeline leak or rupture and ignition events with the associated consequence to predict the probability of <br /> an individual being exposed to a fatal hazard over a one-year period. Land use occupancy factors(i.e., <br /> percent of time each use is occupied)were estimated and included as an input to the annual individual risk <br /> calculations. For this analysis, school and residential uses were assumed to be occupied 100%of the time, — <br /> office, commercial, light industrial and community college uses 30%of the time, and open space and <br /> recreation areas 15%of the time. <br /> Risk transects(measurements of individual risk as a function of distance from a pipeline)were <br /> constructed for the pipelines as part of the quantitative risk assessment modeling.The transects illustrate <br /> how the risk decreases with distance from the pipelines. Individual risk contours constructed for the _ <br /> system of pipelines in the College Park area illustrate the combination of risk because of multiple <br /> pipelines in the different utility corridors(Figure 3,Appendix K). <br /> An acceptable level of individual risk associated with underground pipelines has not been established by <br /> the state or the federal government for new land uses other than schools. Various governmental agencies <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR <br /> Public Health and Safety 4.9-34 San Joaquin County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.