My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004916
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
18353
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500142
>
SU0004916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 9:43:57 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:44:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004916
PE
2638
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500142
STREET_NUMBER
18353
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
3/17/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18353 W GRANT LINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/15/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\18353\PA-0500142\SU0004916\COLLEGE PRK SP III.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
865
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS <br /> The following criteria are used to evaluate the potential significance of LOS impacts at signalized intersections: _ <br /> Intersections on freeways/state facilities LOS D <br /> Intersections on gateway roadways LOS D _ <br /> Intersections on county roadways LOS C <br /> Intersections on Mountain House CSD streets LOS C <br /> City of Tracy planning area within V4 mile of I-205 LOS D <br /> Grant Line Road in Alameda County LOS D <br /> In this section,the LOS analysis is conducted based on peak-hour intersection LOS as defined in the 2000 <br /> Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board 2000). A description of the LOS analysis - <br /> methodology is provided in Table 4.114. <br /> Table 4.11-4 - <br /> Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections <br /> Level of Control Delay/ <br /> Service Type of Flow Delay Maneuverability Vehicle _ <br /> (s/veh) <br /> A Stable Very slight delay.Progression is very Turning movements are easily < 10.0 <br /> Flow favorable,with most vehicles arriving during made,and nearly all drivers <br /> the green phase and not stopping. find freedom of operation. <br /> B Stable Good progression and/or short cycle lengths. Vehicle platoons are formed. > 10-20 <br /> Flow More vehicles stop than for LOS A,causing Many drivers begin to feel _ <br /> higher levels of average delay. somewhat restricted within <br /> groups of vehicles. <br /> C Stable Flow Higher delays resulting from fair progression Back-ups may develop behind >20-35 _ <br /> and/or longer cycle lengths.Individual cycle turning vehicles.Most drivers <br /> failures may begin to appear at this level.The feel somewhat restricted. <br /> number of vehicles stopping is significant, <br /> although many still pass through the - <br /> intersection without stopping. <br /> D Approaching The influence of congestion becomes more Maneuverability is severely >35-55 <br /> Unstable noticeable.Longer delays may result in some limited during short periods due - <br /> Flow combination of unfavorable progression,long to temporary back ups. <br /> cycle lengths,or high volume-to-capacity <br /> ratios.Many vehicles stop,and the proportion <br /> of vehicles not stopping declines.Individual <br /> cycle failures are noticeable. <br /> E Unstable Generally considered to be the limit of There are typically long queues >55-80 <br /> Flow acceptable delay.Indicative of poor of vehicles waiting upstream of <br /> progression,long cycle lengths,and high the intersection. <br /> volume-to-capacity ratios. Individual cycle <br /> failures are frequent occurrences. <br /> F Forced Flow Generally considered to be unacceptable to most Jammed conditions.Back ups >80 <br /> drivers.Often occurs with oversaturation.May from other locations restrict or <br /> also occur at high volume-to-capacity ratios. prevent movement.Volumes _ <br /> There are many individual cycle failures.Poor may vary widely,depending <br /> progression and long cycle lengths may also be principally on the downstream <br /> major contributing factors. back-up conditions. <br /> Source: Transportation Research Board 2000 and Highway Research Board 1965 <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR - <br /> Transportation 4.11-16 San Joaquin County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.