SU0006455 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

` residential development if the specific lot type/product design criteria for said residential development is 3 included as-part of a Special Purpose Plan; 3) modify the exception allowing a zero side setback in the R- M zone by reducing the building-separation requirement(between..the building'on the subject lot and the building on the adjacent,lot)from.10 feet to 8-feet, 4) modify the exceptions allowing a zero rear.setback by reducing the building separation requirement(between single storygarages and.accessory buildings located on the rear third of tate sublec#lot; and any structure on the adjacent lot)from ;1b,to-8 feet;.5) simplify the corner lot side setback requirement by specifying that it is a ual to the no - i - � .. . 9 q normal side setback requirement plus 5 feet, in all residential•zones;'6)add a footnote concerning building separation and side yard requirements in the RSM zone and in the R-M small lot zone making said requirements the same as the R-M requirements outside of Specific Plan III; 7) exclude from the corner lot category those lots siding.on pedestrian paseos, Homeowners'Association (HOA) landscape parcels, and street rights- of-way that include a minimum of 5 feet landscaping adjacent to the subject parcel; 8) allow, in instances 1 where"Standard Lot Size"may not be applicable,"Average Lot Size"to substitute for"Standard Lot Size" 4 for lots in the small lot R-M zone in order to calculate Maximum Livable Area; 9) require no less than 15% of R-M zoned small lots (i.e., lots within a subdivision tract in the R-M zone that have a standard lot size of less than 3,600 square feet)that are covered by a Model Home Master Plan to be subject to the j Maximum Livable Area criteria; 10) expand the table concerning the number of plans in a Model Home Master Plan, including defining the minimum and maximum percentages for the use of one plan; and 11) i refer in Chapter 9-310M to Table 9-310.3MCP with respect to height, building coverage, and corner lot dimension requirements. In addition to these changes, Section 9-830.2M and Table 9-305.3M would be changed to permit second unit dwellings in the R-MH zone. Section 9-830.5M would also be changed by increasing the maximum size of second unit dwellings from 700 square feet to 800 square feet. PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located north of Grant Line Road, immediately east of Prosperity Street(yet to be constructed)and immediately north and south of Teixeira Avenue(yet to be constructed), and adjacent to the 75-foot wide PG&E powerline easement, in the southeastern portion of Mountain House, in southwestern San Joaquin County. (Supervisorial District 5) . ENVIRONMENTAL DISCUSSION: On November 22, 2005, the San Joaquin County Board of k Supervisors certified as adequate uate the College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Program Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan III ("EIR"--SCH#2003102074). The Cassano-Kamilos Project is in Specific Plan III and the program EIR adequately describes the Cassano- ' Kamilos Project for the purposes of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(e).The EIR is available at the San Joaquin County Community Development Department, 1810 E. Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA, or on the web at www.siaov,org/commdev under College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Environmental Impact Report Draft. APPLICATION REVIEW: If you have any recommendations or comments on this project, please submit them to the Community Development Department no later than March 23, 2007. Comments or recommendations received after that date may not be used in staffs analysis and recommendation for this application. NOTE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this project. You will receive notice of the date, time and place of the public hearing at a later date. NOTE TO REVIEW AGENCIES: If you wish to be notified of the Planning Commission hearing date for this project, inform the contact person noted above, and you will be placed on the mailing list.Any public agency [ which comments on the proposed project will automatically be placed on the Planning Commission mailing list. 4 .