SU0006455 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

u, Y 2 Specific Plan Amendment(PA-0600643) The Specific Plan Amendment would make the following changes to Specific Plan III: 1) relocate and ~ adjust the area in Neighborhood D designated as RIM, R/MH, and OSIO (i.e., the area located north of Grant Line Road, immediately east of Prosperity Street and immediately north and south of Teixeira Avenue,and adjacent to the 75-foot wide PG&E powerline easement); 2) permit second unit dwellings in the R-MH zoning district; 3) elimihate'minimum lot size requirements in the R-MH zoning district .4)permit different setback, separation, building coverage, and height requirements for new,residential development if the specific lot type/product design criteria for said residential development is included as part of a Special Purpose Plan; 5)-modify the exception allowing a zero side setback in the R-M zone by reducing --the building separationrrequirement(between the building on the subject lot and the building on the adjacent lot)from 10 feet to 8 feet; 6)modify the exceptions allowing a zero rear setback by reducing the building separation requirement(between single story garages and accessory buildings located on the rear third of the subject lot, and any structure on the adjacent lot)from 10 to 8 feet; 7) simplify the corner lot side setback requirement by specifying that it is equal to the normal side setback requirement plus 5 feet, in all residential zones; 8)-add a footnote concerning building separation and side yard requirements - -in the R-M zone and in the RW small lot zone making said requirements the same as the R-M requirements outside of Specific Plan Ill; 9)exclude from the corner lot category those lots siding on pedestrian paseos, Homeowners'Association (HOA)landscape parcels, and street rights-of-way that include a minimum of 5 feet landscaping adjacent to the subject parcel; 10)allow, in instances where "Standard Lot Size"may not be applicable,"Average Lot Size"to substitute for"Standard Lot Size"for lots in the small lot R-M zone in order to calculate Maximum Livable Area; 11) require no less than 15% of.R- M zoned small lots(i.e., lots within a subdivision tract in the R-M zone that have a standard lot size of less than 3,600 square feet)that are covered by a Model Home Master Plan to be subject to the Maximum Livable Area criteria; 12)expand the table concerning the number of plans in a Model Home Master Plan, including defining the minimum and maximum percentages for the use of one plan; 13)specify Italianate t as the design theme for Neighborhood D and Spanish Colonial as the design theme for Neighborhood AIB; 14)specify that lotting patterns in Specific Plan III 'may' include standard front driveway lots, corner side driveway lots, etc; 15) clarify that two Medium-High Density Residential areas, rather than two Multi- Family Residential areas,will provide higher density housing opportunities in Specific Plan III; 16) revise the size range of housing types in Neighborhood D of Specific Plan III from 1,300 to 2,400 square feet, to 1,300 to 2,500 square feet; 17) remove the reference to'two ball fields'for the Neighborhood Park between the two K-8 schools in Neighborhood AIB and replacing it with the phrase 'two joint use areas'; 18) specify that the Neighborhood Park between the two K-8 schools in Neighborhood AIB 'may contain ball fields or other amenities' in the joint use areas rather than indicate that such joint use areas 'will' contain ball fields; 19) specify that private recreation facilities will be provided within the 'larger', as opposed to all, R-MH and R-H residential areas; 20) specify the completion time for children's play areas or pocket parks in multifamily developments with 75 or more units; and 21) specify that, instead of a 12- foot wide path, the width of the multi-use paths paralleling the PG&E gas line easement shall be wide enough to accommodate anticipated volumes of two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic. These changes would affect numerous sections, tables, and figures of the Specific III document. Special Purpose Plan (PA-0600644) Special Purpose Pian would provide a more detailed development framework for residential and open space uses within the Cassano Kamilos Homes Project in Neighborhood D. Said Special Purpose Plan would provide requirements relative to uses, locations, access, physical relationships, landscaping, and architectural design.The intent of the Special Purpose Plan is to provide an adequate level of detail, relative to the design of the proposed development, such that subsequent development may proceed via a series of ministerial actions(Improvement Plans)when such actions are found consistent with the Special Purpose Plan. Development Title Text Amendment(PA-0600645) The Development Title Text Amendment would make the following changes to Table 9-310.3MCP of the Mountain House Development Title: 1) eliminate minimum lot size requirements in the R-MH zoning district; 2) permit different setback, separation, building coverage, and height requirements for new