Laserfiche WebLink
C <br /> MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSEI)AI.TWONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. EJVIRONINENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.15 TRANSPORTATIONMAFFIC <br /> f <br /> i <br /> Some routes offer subscription bus service. The 1997 Mountain house Community TDM . <br /> Program and Transit Plan states that the MHCSD should work to have SMART service <br /> extended to the Mountain House Parkway/Central Parkway,park-n-r de lot when. 1,000 <br /> houses have been occupied..Additionally, express bus service should be provided to jobs in <br /> Tracy before 44,000 residents live in the Mountain House Community(EDAW, 2005b). <br /> - . <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> The SPIIIEIR identifies two traffic impacts associated with development of Specific Plan III, <br /> of which the proposed project is a part. One, concerning potential traffic safety issues during <br /> construction, was )fess than significant. The following impact was potentially significant: <br /> Impact 4.11-1.:Transportation—Effects on 2025 Cumulative With-Project <br /> Conditions on Anticipated Network. This scenario evaluates the traffic impact on <br /> the roadways in the [Specific Plan III] vicinity from the buildout of the proposed <br /> [Specific Plan II1] and the remaining portions of the MHMP in the cumulative 2025 <br /> scenario. Under the cumulative 2025 scenario, some of the arterials in the [Specific <br /> Plan III] vicinity are projected to operate at an unacceptable LOS: Without. <br /> mitigation,traffic impacts on these roadways would be significant. With <br /> implementation of the mitigation adopted previously for MHMP development, <br /> however, traffic effects on all but two of the arterial segments evaluated would be <br /> less than significant. Altamont Pass Road west of Grant Line Road would still be <br /> projected to operate at LOS F,resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. <br /> This result is consistent with the results of the MEIR, ,Also,Byron Road east of <br /> Grant Line Road is projected to operate at LOS D, while the current acceptable <br /> standard for this roadway segment is LOS C. This segment was not projected to <br /> I operate at an unacceptable LOS in the MEIR. The effect on this segment would be <br /> potentially significant. In addition, several freeway segments in the project area are <br /> projected to operate at LOS F, as found in the MEIR. A significant and unavoidable <br /> impact would occur. <br /> MITIGATION,MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> The SPIIIEIR determined that there is no additional mitigation to those provided in the MEIR <br /> that would reduce the 2025 cumulative traffic impact on Altamont Pass Road west of Grant <br /> Line Road and on I-580, 1-205, and I-5 north of 1-205 to a less-than-significant level. Impact <br /> on these road segments would remain significant and unavoidable. <br /> SPIIIEIR Mitigation Measure 4.11-1 states that for consistency with previously adopted <br /> roadway standards, San Joaquin County shall extend the standard of LOS D acceptability to <br /> the segment of Byron Road east of Grant Line Road_ It has become more evident in the past <br /> few decades that experiences with best practices and design support the adoption of LOS D <br /> as an acceptable standard. Adopting LOS C standards for street design can lead to unusually <br /> wide streets, high speeds, and dangers to pedestrians and bicyclists. For example, in the case <br /> of Byron Road east of Grant Line Road, a four-lane roadway would suffice for LOS D <br /> whereas LOS C would require a six-lane roadway. <br /> 4-74 <br />