SU0011532 SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3.1 The Phase I ESA conducted searches of federal and state environmental regulatory databases through EDR and contacted state and local regulatory agencies for additional information. Field reconnaissance of the project site was conducted that specifically looked for potential RECs. 3.2 The database search and agency contacts did not reveal any past sources of contamination.The site had been used in the past for agricultural activities; however, no RECs associated with past agricultural uses were identified. 3.3 The Phase I ESA did not identify any RECs at the project site. No RECs were identified on adjacent sites. Minor amounts of trash were observed on the property, but no leakages,spills, or other releases were observed.An abandoned groundwater well was observed, but site observations and EHD records indicate the well had been destroyed and is not a REC.A pad- mounted transformer owned by PG&E was observed on the project site, but there is no evidence of any releases. The transformer was not identified as a REC.The site was evaluated for vapor encroachment conditions, and the Phase I ESA concluded that no such conditions existed on the project site. 3.4 Adjoining properties were evaluated in the Phase I ESA for potential RECs through database searches and site observations.The Home Depot located adjacent to and west of the project site was identified as a RCRA-Small Quantity Generator of hazardous materials. However, no violations of hazardous material regulations were listed with this activity, and it is located down- gradient of the project site;therefore, it is not considered a REC. Other listed facilities were found in the vicinity but were not considered RECs due to their distance from the project site and the regional depth to groundwater,which was determined to be 60 feet below ground surface. 3.5 See 3.4 above. 4.1 No past or current sources of contamination were identified on or near the project site.The Phase I ESA evaluated potential contamination and concluded that no further action needs to be taken. 5.1 The Phase I ESA concluded that no RECs or Controlled RECs existed on or adjacent to the project site. It also concluded that no further investigation was warranted at this time.