Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Water Quality Management 2 <br /> French Oils, LLC <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> lb) Maintenance Processes / Cleaning. <br /> Exterior. The exterior of the equipment requires no maintenance/cleaning other than an <br /> occasional wipe-down with a rag to prevent buildup of dust or any other materials <br /> settling on the equipment. This requires no. water or solvents. <br /> Interior. The process for cleaning the .interior of the equipment and lines is to re- <br /> circulate oil. No water or .solvents are used. (See .attached equipment vendor <br /> letter (RD. Equipment-Romero Letter.pdf [President &. GM, RD Equipment Co. , an <br /> Anderson Intl. distributor] ) and Anderson Intl-Vavpot. eMail.html [VP, Anderson <br /> Intl. Corp, equipment manufacturer] ) . <br /> (In reference to the Vavpot email, we have no plans of adding a cooling tower. This <br /> tower is not necessary for operational efficiency, effectiveness or safety but <br /> moreso is a quality enhancement (faster cooling of the oils lowers the free <br /> fatty acids and improves quality) . If this ever becomes .relevant this would <br /> act as another closed system, like to boiler and would be handled. in the same <br /> -~-.manner)' .. ., <br /> If at some point in time we decide to run other products (i.e. safflower) the machine <br /> changeover process would be ,to flush the lines by running the new product through <br /> the machines and pushing the oils into a- "mixed oil" tank. This limited amount of <br /> oil would likely end up as biodiesel. Again, there would be no water or solvents <br /> pushed through the lines and no wastewater. <br /> if, in any event, there were some purpose to flushing the lines with water or <br /> detergents that was above/beyond the manufacturers recommendations this would be a <br /> fully contained exercise. Basically, anything flushed through the lines, or the <br /> cleaning of the tanks themselves would be captured within the storage tanks. This <br /> water (if this ever came up) would be stored and hauled away off site. • See "Plans <br /> for Managing Waste Streams" below for details. <br /> Parts. Any equipment/parts that interact with the corn germ itself, if necessary, <br /> would be cleaned with a -steel brush to remove any build up. No water- or solvents <br /> would be used. <br /> The most drastic scenario would be if there were a procedural breakdown and product was <br /> left in the expellers and caked onto the machines. This too would be handled by <br /> steel brush. In a very extreme circumstance, those affected parts (expeller <br /> screw, cages and bars) would be removed and sent off-site for maintenance (which <br /> is a regularly occurring process as these parts occasionally need to be retooled <br /> [i.e. ground/sharpened] ) . A second set of' parts would. be swapped to keep the <br /> machines .running,___which. would also_be-standard-.procedure.--- <br /> 2.VariouB waste streams that will be generated <br /> Waste Streams Generated: <br /> • Water Treatment Vessels. Periodically, the water treatment vessels .will <br /> need to be "recharged" ; through some ion-exchange process (i.e. reverse <br /> osmosis, etc. ) . <br /> • Blow-Down Tank. This blow down tank will contain primarily hard mineral <br /> deposits (what would otherwise be scale in the boilers) and brine from <br /> the water treatment (specific analysis pending) . <br /> • Oil Lines / Tanks_ Only as a continency, against the manufacturers <br /> recommendations. If this were to occur, the oil tanks themselves would <br /> capture any waste water, which may be a mix of oils, water and <br /> detergents_ <br /> • Other: Storm Water-. -Based-on the--ini-tia-1—r-espouse-from- the -San--Joaquin <br /> County Community Development Department (1/14/09 meeting) , there would be <br /> no requirements for storm water management. However, per Tim O'Brien' s <br /> recommendation, I have followed up with Nova Clemenza, and per those <br /> conversations I am pursuing the "notice of non-applicability" , but <br /> waiting for a final response from the SJCCDD and Central Valley Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board to determine if that -will be necessary. <br /> Provided in 27 February 2009 e-mail from Mike Seley to Regional Board sleff <br />