Laserfiche WebLink
5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L INITIAL STUDY <br /> 9.LAND USE AND PLANNING <br /> For Impact No. 2 above, the 1994 MEIR recommended changes in either the <br /> San Joaquin County General Plan or the Mountain House Master Pian to resolve <br /> conflicts involving land use designations, permitted uses and densities, and <br /> roadway classifications, right-of-way widths, and level of service standards. It <br /> also recommended revising Master Plan policies and performance standards for <br /> regional park standards and for wildlife mitigation in accordance with other <br /> mitigation measures recommended in the 1994 MEIR. in conjunction with <br /> adoption of the Master Plan,the County adopted General Plan amendments to <br /> resolve the conflicts with the Master Plan, but found that the Master Plan was not <br /> inconsistent with regional park standards or wildlife mitigation requirements. <br /> For Impact No. 3 above,the 1994 MEIR recommended either changing the <br /> Master Plan standards or amending the Development Title to resolve the <br /> inconsistencies that allowed more lenient standards in the Master Plan. For <br /> each such inconsistency,the County amended the Development Title to resolve <br /> the differences. <br /> Discussion Regarding Neighborhoods K and L <br /> a) Would the project physically divide an established community? <br /> Development of Neighborhoods K and L as proposed by the project would not <br /> divide an established community because it would be constructed in an area that <br /> was historically used for farming. No housing would be removed to <br /> accommodate development of the two neighborhoods. . <br /> Other on-and off-site modifications such as road improvements and <br /> infrastructure construction would not physically divide any established <br /> communities. The PG&E Weber-Herdlyn electrical line,which once passed <br /> through the northern part of the Neighborhoods K and L project site parallel to <br /> Old River,was relocated to an alignment that parallels Bryon Road. <br /> b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy, or <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including, but not <br /> limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br /> ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br /> environmental effect? <br /> The Mountain House Master Plan has over 300 policies addressing land use, <br /> environmental issues, densities, provision of services/utilities, and other issues <br /> for development within the Mountain House community. The proposed <br /> Neighborhoods K and L Tentative Subdivision Maps would not create any <br /> inconsistencies with Master Plan policies. <br /> The discussion below reviews the main chapters of the 1994 Master Plan. For <br /> each topic,the potential for the project to conflict with goals and policies of the <br /> Master Plan is addressed. Where appropriate, reference is made to specific <br /> sections of the Initial Study where the topic is addressed in more detail. <br /> (917111) 5-124 <br />