SU0004969 SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The deep holes were also prepared by staff of Neil O. Anderson on December 20, 2005 and the 24 hour presoak period was started. A 2 inch PVC pipe with perforations at the bottom was installed into the test hole and gravel was poured in the annular space. 6.4escription of the Date, Time and Condition of the Test Hole After the 24-Hour Soak Peri d (Hole Still Intact, Hole Dry, Depth to Water Remaining in Hole, Etc.): On De ember 21, 2005 the four shallow test holes were dry. Six inches of water was added to the holes and the holes were deemed suitable to continue. One of the shallow tests passed the minimum County requirements. On December 21, 2005, the four deep test holes were found to be act an water was remaining in the holes. Four hour tests were performed. (See test results ' ,appendix.) 6.5 The Test Conformed to San Joaquin County Policy EHD 02-02 (Correct Depth, diameter, 2" gravel, 611 Water Refill,Correct Readings Recorded): The percolation tests conformed to San Joaquin County Policy EHD 02-02. 6.6 omplete Percolation Test Form (Including Readings) Was Provided With I6 REHS Ver Signature. The Rate Was Correctly Calculated Using the Last Reading: See Appendix for Test Result Form. Shallow TEST HOLE *PERCOLATION RATE Parcel 1 - (FAIL) Parcel 2 - (FAIL) Parcel 3 25 MINJIN. (PASS) Parcel 4 250 MINJIN. (FAIL) Dee L TEST HOLE *PERCOLATION RATE Parcel 1 50 MINJIN. - (FAIL) Parcel 2 250 MINJIN. - (FAIL) 6„ Parcel 3 25 MINJIN. (PASS) Parcel 4 250 MINJIN. (FAIL) I L *See Results in Appendix. 6.7iscussion of Any Potential Problems Predicted and/Or the Need for An Engineered or Alt rnative Septic System: In this area, the soils are classified as San Joaquin sandy loam and Redding loam. Due to this classification and percolation rates, a standard septic system similar to those found on surrounding parcels would be recommended on Parcel 3. Engineered systems are recommended on Parcels 1, 2, and 4. 4 c:\0563\Soil Report