Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl <br /> methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a <br /> water level indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted <br /> to a groundwater elevation for each well and used to construct a groundwater elevation contour map <br /> (Figure 2), and calculate the Iocal groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater <br /> at the site was measured at depths between 67 07 to 80 00 feet below ground surface (bgs) The <br /> groundwater potentiometric surface elevation averaged approximately 28 22 feet bgs during this <br /> monitoring event The groundwater elevation has decreased approximately 0 59 feet since the last <br /> sampling event in December 1999 The groundwater flow direction during this reporting period is <br /> toward the southwest with a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 03 ft /ft A summary of data <br /> regarding groundwater levels measured through Feburary 17, 2000 is presented in Table 1 Copies <br /> of field observations documenting work performed at the site is presented in Attachment I <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> The distribution of groundwater sample analytical results obtained from monitor wells at the site on <br /> February 17, 2000, is presented on Figure 3 and summarized in Table 2 TPHg and BTEX were <br /> present at detectable concentrations in eight of the nine samples submitted for analysis Chemical <br /> analytical results indicate the highest concentrations of TPHg and benzene are in the vicinity of <br /> monitor wells MW-3 and MW-4 TPHg concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from 1,150 <br /> micrograms per liter(ug/L) in monitor well MW-3,to less than detectable levels in samples collected <br /> from monitor wells MW-2 and MW-7 Benzene concentrations ranged from below the laboratory <br /> method detection limit in monitor wells MW-2,MW-5 through MW-8, and MW-10,to 144 ug/L in <br /> MW-3 MTBE concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from below the laboratory method <br /> detection limit in monitor wells MW--2,MW-3 and MW-7 through MW-10,to 10 1 ug/L in a sample <br /> collected from monitor well MW-4 Attachment H contains photocopies of the laboratory analytical <br /> report and the chain-of-custody form <br /> Approximately 4 79 feet of liquid phase hydrocarbon (LPH) was detected in MW-1 during this <br /> monitoring event The physical appearance (clear) and its presence in the subsurface vapor <br /> extraction piping suggest that the LPH is the result of condensed soil vapor Asa precaution,the site <br /> inventory records and leak detection systems were checked, and a visual comparison was made <br /> between the LPH and all three grades of gasoline currently dispensed at the site Inventory records <br /> and leak detection systems were normal and the LPH did not visually match the colored grades of <br /> gasoline dispensed at the site The LPH is currently being removed from MW-I by hand bailing <br /> methods and the use of a passive, down-hole petroleum skimmer <br /> C Slime O1Rfne4efordQ100 a SECOR <br /> 077 41737 003 ApH3 24 2000 <br />