Laserfiche WebLink
SECOR www secorcom <br /> R <br /> INTERNATIONAL <br /> R <br /> S E C ® INCORPORATED 3017 Kilgore Road,Sude 104 <br /> Rancho Cordova,CA 95670 <br /> • 916 861 0400 TEL <br /> F <br /> 9 1 861 0430 FAX <br /> February 4, 2004 R IE CE `W11 i <br /> Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson FEB 12 2004 <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> RE Quarterly Monitoring Report, October— December 2003 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> SECOR Project No 770T 41737 00 <br /> Ms Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway 88, Lockeford, California (the site, see Figure 1) In addition, this report <br /> also includes a quarterly summary of the operation of the soil vapor extraction (SVE)/air sparge (AS) <br /> remediation system at the site <br /> • GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Seven groundwater monitor wells were sampled on October 20,2003 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In July 1996, <br /> monitor wells MW-5 through MWA0 were installed as part of an additional environmental site assessment <br /> Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken, and subjective analyses was <br /> performed The subjective analyses consisted of checking for the presence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons <br /> (LPH)or a hydrocarbon sheen by lowering a clean Teflon®bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the <br /> groundwater-air interface Wells not containing LPH were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of <br /> water or until groundwater parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by <br /> portable meters calibrated to a standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover or <br /> purged dry, the water level in the monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static level <br /> before sampling The groundwater samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer into the <br /> well and collecting a representative sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to laboratory- <br /> cleaned sample containers,sealed with Teflon®-lined caps,labeled with the sample number,sample time and <br /> date, and immediately placed on ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of- <br /> custody record for delivery to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville, California Groundwater <br /> samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX) using modified EPA Method 801518020,and for fuel oxygenates including <br /> methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETRE), tertiary amyl <br /> methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) using EPA Method 82608 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water level <br /> indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was used to calculate a <br /> • groundwater elevation for each well,and construct a groundwater elevation contour map(Figure 2) Using the <br /> groundwater elevation contour map, the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient were <br /> determined Groundwater at the site was measured at depths between 71 98 to 93 11 feet below ground <br /> surface (bgs) The groundwater potentiometnc surface elevation averaged approximately 23 49 feet bgs <br /> I\Time Oil\Lockeford\QMRs12001-2003\Lockeford Q4-03 doc <br />