ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007139 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r. r j P H 0 N L 285 2y CABLE ADDRESS Ti r.0 L SEATTLE TE (FAX) 206 283 8036 TACOMA " PORTLAND OS ANGELES y �; ON TIME OIL CO . x�a — n s 2737 WEST COMMODORE WAY SEATTLE WA 98199 1233 rRooucrs ' P O BOX 24447 SEATTLE WA 98124-0447 TIME TESTED E Mr Harlin Knoll San Joaquin County Public Health Services APR 1 200-1 Environmental Health Division P O Box 2009 ENVIRONMENT HEALTH Stockton, California 95201 PERMIT/SERVICES RE Submittal of"Quarterly Monitoring Report, January—March 2003"for Jackpot Food Mart, 14000 E Highway 88, t_ockeford, California (Property No 04-049) Dear Mr Knoll, An environmental investigation was implemented at the subject site in December 1994 to evaluate the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and to determine whether or not groundwater had been impacted Four monitoring wells were installed during this investigation (MW-1 through MW-4) In July 1996, six additional monitoring wells were installed on and off of the subject site to assist in defining the extent of groundwater impacts (MW-5 through MW-10), and quarterly monitoring was implemented In August and September 1999, SECOR installed a vapor extraction/air sparging system at the subject site to remediate hydrocarbon- impacted sods and groundwater System operation began December 13, 1999 �y Please find enclosed SECOR's "Quarterly Monitoring Report, January - March 2003" dated April 4, 2003 This document presents analytical results and field observations collected during First Quarter 2003 groundwater sampling, and discusses the efficiency of the remediation system currently in operation First Quarter 2003 Groundwater Sampling Results On January 16, 2003, groundwater samples were collected from each of the monitoring wells at the subject site (MW-1 through MW-10) Prior to purging, the depth to water in all wells was measured to evaluate elevation, flow direction, and gradient As noted in the attached report, groundwater with a south- southwesterly flow direction and a gradient of 0 03 ft/ft was encountered in the wells at depths of 70 94 feet to 84 98 feet below ground surface Free product was not encountered to any of the wells The locations of the wells are identified on Figure 2 of the attached report Since the November 2002 sampling event, groundwater elevation decreased in MW-5 by 4 19 feet and in MW-10 by 5 06 feet, while it increased by 0 00 feet to 0 77 feet in the remaining wells These changes resulted in an overall average decrease in groundwater elevation of 0 55 feet across the site Changes in groundwater elevation are most likely a result of seasonal variation and operation of the remediation system Groundwater gradient and flow direction remained consistent with previously collected data Table 1 in the attached report summarizes historical groundwater elevation data Hydrocarbons were identified in the sample collected from MWA (3,200 ugll TPH-g, 2 1 ugll benzene, 3 8 ugll ethylbenzene, and 107 ug/l xylenes) TPH-g and BTEX were not identified in the groundwater samples submitted from MW-2 through MW-10 Analyses identified low concentrations of MTBE in the samples collected from MWA (1 5 ug/1) and MW-9 (1 3 ugh), however, none of the other samples contained detectable concentrations of MTBE Other fuel oxygenates (TBA, DIPS, ETBE,and TAME)were not present at detectable concentrations in any of the samples Table 2, Table 3, and Figure 3 in the attached report summarize groundwater analytical data and laboratory reports are included as Attachment 2 The highest concentrations of hydrocarbons appear to remain onsite in the vicinity of the pump islands (MW- 1) When compared to the November 2002 sampling data, hydrocarbon concentrations decreased in MWA while they remained essentially"non-detect" in the remainder of the wells Since the initiation of remediation efforts, hydrocarbon concentrations across the site have substantially decreased