Laserfiche WebLink
SECOR www secor com <br /> INTERNATIONAL 3017 Kilgore Road,Suite too <br /> i� <br /> S E C 0 1F INCORPORATED Rancho Cordova,CA 95670 <br /> 916-8610400 TEL <br /> 916 861 0430 FAX <br /> April 4, 2003 <br /> Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> RE Quarterly Monitoring Report, January— March 2003 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> SECOR Project No 770T 41737 00 <br /> Ms Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway 88, Lockeford,California(the site,see Figure 1) In addition,the operation <br /> of the soil vapor extraction and air sparging remediation system is described <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Ten groundwater monitor wells were sampled on January 16, 2003 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In July 1996, <br /> monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site assessment <br /> Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well,a water sample was taken and subjective analyses performed <br /> The subjective analyses consisted of checking for liquid-phase hydrocarbons(LPH)or a hydrocarbon sheen <br /> by lowering a clean Teflon® bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the groundwater-air interface <br /> Wells not containing LPH were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of water or until groundwater <br /> parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by portable meters calibrated to a <br /> standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover or purged dry,the water level in the <br /> monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static level before sampling The groundwater <br /> samples were there collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer Into the well and collecting a representative <br /> sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to laboratory-cleaned sample containers,sealed <br /> with Teflon®-lined caps, labeled with the sample number,sample time and date, and immediately placed on <br /> ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of-custody record for subsequent delivery <br /> to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville,California Groundwater samples were analyzed for <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg),benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX)using <br /> modified EPA Method 60218015, and for fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE),di-isopropyl ether <br /> (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) using <br /> EPA Method 8260 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water level <br /> indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted to a groundwater <br /> elevation for each well and used to construct a groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 2), and calculate <br /> the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater at the site was measured at depths <br /> between 70 94 to 84 98 feet below ground surface(bgs) The groundwater potentiometric surface elevation <br /> averaged approximately 24 27 feet bgs during this monitoring event <br /> I Mme 0111Lockefordl0MRs\Lookeford Q1-03 doc <br />