Laserfiche WebLink
2.3 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Groundwater monitoring of the site has been performed by AGS and Nations Groundwater <br /> Associates (NGA) on seven occasions since June of 1987 AGS and NGA reported that <br /> groundwater flowed consistently to the southwest between June 1987 and April 1991 <br /> However, in a report dated February 2, 1993, NGA depicted a northeasterly groundwater <br /> iflow on November 12, 1992 This direction may be a one-time anomaly or, more likely, may <br /> be erroneous (Harlin Knoll, personal communication, 1994) <br /> Hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater samples from the monitoring wells during each <br /> monitoring event Concentrations have varied over time, but no clear pattern has emerged <br /> Benzene, toluene and xylenes were detected during the most recent groundwater monitoring <br />' event (November 12, 1992) <br /> 2.4 UST Removal <br /> The UST's and product lines were pressure tested for leaks in 1987 The tanks and piping <br /> passed the pressure tests, however, a faulty vapor recovery valve was discovered and <br /> repaired _ <br /> It is our understanding that two UST's were removed from the site in March of 1990 Eight <br /> samples were analyzed by EPA methods 8240 and 8260 for volatile and semi-volatile <br /> hydrocarbons Gasoline contamination was detected in soil samples collected beneath the <br /> tanks According to the San Joaquin County Public Health Services - EnviioniiientaI Health <br /> Division (PHS/EHD), approximately 800 cubic yards of gasoline-contaminated soil were <br /> removed from the tank excavation and stockpiled on-site <br /> 2.5 Further Investigation <br /> _ <br /> As a result of the continued evidence of groundwater contamination, PHS/EHD notified Mr <br /> Phillips that failure to take corrective action to remove the contamination would jeopardize <br /> I his eligibility for reinibuisement from the state underground tank cleanup fund (SB 2004) <br /> Mi Phillips therefore retained GeoAudit to perform additional subsui face investigation of <br /> the extent of soil and groundwater contamination <br /> 3.0 PROCEDURES <br /> 3.1 Drilling and Sampling <br />' From January 11 to 17, 1994, four soil borings were drilled at the site Borings MW-5 and <br /> MW-6 were advanced to a depth of 85 feet and completed as groundwater monitoring wells <br /> Borings B7 and B8 were advanced to a depth of 65 feet and backfilled in the entire depth <br />' with Portland cement Auger returns were placed in 55-gallon DOT drums and stored on- <br /> G.nbarc.l Aide s.— Inc 4 <br /> II�c4eford Bacon QR/1 WX60 5 <br /> I <br />