Laserfiche WebLink
■p <br /> File No. 20-1100-38 Ri KLEIN FELDER <br /> September 12, 1996 <br /> Summarized in Table I below are the soil properties for the three basic soil groups encountered in <br /> the test borings. As previously stated, the strength properties shown were based on laboratory <br /> tests on relatively undisturbed core samples and on back calculating what strength properties <br /> ` would be necessary for the existing nearby steep slopes to stand with a factor of safety of <br /> approximately 1.2. <br /> TABLE 1 <br /> SOIL PROPERTIES <br /> Angle of Moisture Unit <br /> Soil Internal Friction Cohesion Weight <br /> Type (degrees) (psf) (pef) <br /> _ Cemented Sand and <br /> Gravel 36 900 130 <br /> Silty Clay 24 500 120 <br /> Sandy Clay/Silty Sand 25 1350 1 120 <br /> The existing slopes at the adjacent Teichert Quarry confirm that the sand and gravel deposits are <br /> partially cemented. These lower materials have more inherent cohesion than would normally be <br /> assumed, considering grain size distribution only. In our opinion, the laboratory tests on samples <br /> r <br /> from our test borings justify relatively high shear strength parameters. <br /> The effect of ground shaking on the computed factors of safety was evaluated by applying a <br /> pseudo-static seismic load. The practice in this area is to utilize a mean peak ground acceleration <br /> corresponding to a maximum probable earthquake (10 percent chance of exceedance in 50 years) <br /> roughly approximated by a pseudo-static analysis. Based on the proximity of the nearest faults <br /> VP and estimates of maximum probable earthquakes, it is our opinion that a 0.15g design acceleration <br /> value is appropriate for this study. <br /> Circular arc failure surfaces were analyzed using the Bishop's Simplified method. This method <br /> utilizes the slope configuration, unit weight and shear strength properties of the exposed materials, <br /> and internal forces due to water pressures. After a potential failure surface has been assumed, the <br /> soil mass located above the failure surface is divided into a series of vertical slices. Forces acting <br /> on each slice include the slice weight, the pore pressure, the effective normal force on the base, <br /> the mobilized shear force (including both cohesion and friction), and the horizontal side forces <br /> due to earth pressures. The factor of safety is calculated by determining the ratio of the moment <br /> of resistance (cohesion and friction along the failure surface) to the moment of the driving forces <br /> about the center of the assumed circular failure surface arc. The computer program SLOPE/W <br /> was used to perform automatic searches of different potential failure surfaces and to compute a <br /> critical failure surface having the lowest factor of safety for a particular analysis condition. <br /> 10-1100-381MR960198 Page 4 of 6 01996, Kleinfelder,Ina <br />